Liek a restricted entry into a house, so should the entry be restricted to the Temple or any place of worship. However, when we talk on the subject, why not have impartial, unbiased approach. Have an unrestricted right of entry not to temples alone but also to the Masjids and Churches. To me it appears unreasonable to apply any such law to Temples alone. Why this bias against Hindus ?
RE:Temple entry to all
by George Abraham on Jun 07, 2007 10:49 AM Permalink
There is no restriction for non-christians to enter and worship in the church.
RE:Temple entry to all
by Tinda on Jun 07, 2007 12:27 PM Permalink
Of course not. The main aim of church is conversion of heathes. IN fact they offer sacks of rice to pagans who want to come to church. The real game starts after conversion when the church asks 10 percent of the income of converts as tithe.
RE:Temple entry to all
by George Abraham on Jun 07, 2007 12:42 PM Permalink
By giving rice one cannot convert a person. Even if he does the converted one cannot last long in the new faith. Changing the label is easy but changing the mindset is not. If you think that giving money and gifts one can convert the people, why don't you try to convert christians into hinduism? You know very well that you will fail in your attempt. If you think that people are converting for money why rich people are also converting? Giving tithe is only optional not compulsary one. The church is not dependent on human support it stands on God's support. Try to google to find out what the people converted into christianity are saying? Do not think in one angle.
