"ibn salam was appointed by jews themselves. His decision was obligatory on Mohammad PBUH too. His verdict was in accordance with torah , jewish sacred book.".
I have a problem with this line of argument. Prophet is asid to be Apostle of God. If something was wrong with Torah, he ought to have overruled it and pointed the right waty to mankind that surrendered people should not be killed.
"Rather than waiting to gain more maturity, you have decided to become an activist.
Internet gives you anonymosity, that means learned among you will not have a chance to guide you.
You rely heavily on third grade shallow websites, whose only purpose is to twist facts to abuse muslims, quran and Islam.
these fact may not allow you to swallow any truth, if it goes agianst your preformed opinion".
These words of yours stimulate my thinking and I will certainly reflect on it if this is the case with me. But instead of using adjectives like shallow ec. why not give facts to disprove them wrong? Why dont u debate in these sites so visitors will get your views also???
regarding those websites which twist facts to abuse muslims. I do not rate them more than third grade, not becoz they are agisnst muslims, but becoz of the dishonest ways they twist the facts
there are many muslims who counter their arguement. and those people who visit those sites for the purpose of aquiring some knowledge realise the disparity. However those people who visit the sites in search of 'masala' to set score with muslim bloggers pay attention selectively to those items which go against them.
RE:RE:Abdul Hameed
by Anand Iyer on Jun 07, 2007 07:01 PM Permalink
Mnay muslims who counter arguments do not ahve knowledge of scriptures. They parrot merely all arguments told to them. study scriptures and demolish their logic brick by brick with facts.
