Do you think a person should be appreciated for his efforts to decide the faith of the case in 10 years?
Either we need to change the judiciary system or bring new crop of judges who can take the decisions fast...
Why we have to hang 10 years for the verdict?
Mr. Kode - if you are dedicated enough and loves your profession then please first learn how to take the decision in short time rather than proving yourself as the greatest judge of recent times.
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by joen jenson on Jul 31, 2007 05:36 PM Permalink
Keep your mouth close. i hope u never have rights to comment on him. close ur mouth and read the article.ok
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Shah on Jul 31, 2007 05:41 PM Permalink
Dear Sam,
Agree with you that the case was complicated and also have thousands of pages to read and understand the case.
Lets be practical and ask yourself how much time you need to resolve a query between a group of persons who claim to be innocent if you were to be a JUDGE?
We are just following the same old tendency of our ancestors who learn the judiciary from British people.
We need a revolution here to break this system and have a new JUDICIARY SYSTEM where you dont have to wait for the judgement for years.
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Sammy Sam on Jul 31, 2007 05:47 PM Permalink
Mr. Shah,
You are right, But you will also agree with me that there is a process which is followed of appeals, requests, allegations, couner allegations, witness etc which is documented and thn evaluate. Its complex process
In my openion and as can be seen from many other friends who are on board feel he has done good job.
He ensured judgement was right and you can see every one is delighted with results. Regards
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Shah on Jul 31, 2007 06:19 PM Permalink
I am not degrading Mr. Kode but trying to highlight the fact which cannot be buried...
1. The case took more than a decade which is a tight slap on the face of the Judiciary Sytem.
2. Why the cases of high profile mumbai politicians (who were responsible for mass killings before the blast)had immediate verdict?
3. Not a single person was sentenced to death nor anybody was held responsible?
4. Bold decisions are appreciated if its same for the high profile politicians and a common citizen...
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Sammy Sam on Jul 31, 2007 06:33 PM Permalink
This is my openion, Its better justice delayed than justice denied.. Regards
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by DATTATRAY SANE on Jul 31, 2007 06:03 PM Permalink
THE JUDGE HAS TO FOLLOW THE LAW ENACTED BY OUR PREDECESSORS.mR SHAH DO YOU REMEMBER SHAH COMMIISSION NO DECISIOMN TILL IT WOUND UP.YOU ARE WRITING LIKE AN IMBICILE.EVEN IN COUNYTRY LIKE PAKISTAN WITH GENERAL IN COMMAND IT TOOK TIME FOR THE CASES.WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA . POOR INVESIGATOR DIED ARE YOU RELATED TO IDI AMIN WHO THEW OUT PEOPLE THE WAY YOU THINK & DESTRUYED THE COUNTRY.YOU R NOT WORTH MY TIME!
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Sammy Sam on Jul 31, 2007 05:32 PM Permalink
Friend,
This was complex case Kode had a daunting task of going through 13,000 pages of oral evidence, 7,000 pages of documentary evidence and 6,700 pages of statements of the accused. There were a whopping 686 witnesses in the case.
Do you feel its an easy task??? lest be practical..
RE:Kode - Do you deserve appreciation?
by Srcs Prasad on Jul 31, 2007 05:47 PM Permalink
IT IS A NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TO CRITISISE A JUDGE FOR TAKING LONG TIME TO DELIVER A VERDICT, WHEN YU DON'T KNOW THE DEPTH OF THE CASE.PL.DONT SHOW YUR IMMETURITY.
