This is very unfortunate and prove that law is blind and it we want to kill crimnal not crime. Sanjay had not killed any one still he was punished. There are crimnals who killed many peoples and still playing with life of public but no body take action against them.
RE:Law is Blind, Always try to kill crimnal nor crime
by bagpuss on Jul 31, 2007 02:17 PM Permalink
yes... salman khan & navjot are examples of people who killed another & are still freely walking about in society.
RE:Law is Blind, Always try to kill crimnal nor crime
by Ramesh Saxena on Jul 31, 2007 02:17 PM Permalink
These celebrities always take law in hand and are never worried about getting convicted. Forget how many hit movies dutt has given, he was only making money for himself and was doing was director told him. Off-screen Dutt doesnt have enough sense to realize, what he is going is wrong . His deeds are against the law. When he doesnt think about innocent people who could be killed by the weapons he is possessing, when he can have dinner with dawood and be friends with abu salem, let him goto jail and have dinner with salem their. Lesson to all power brokers and celebrities.
RE:Law is Blind, Always try to kill crimnal nor crime
by mvs on Jul 31, 2007 02:36 PM Permalink
yes he is not a criminal...lets give all other indians AK 47 and allow them to keep it...no law broken..Atleast happy that Judge is able to give Justice....with the culprits who are breaking the law of the land....
RE:RE:Law is Blind, Always try to kill crimnal nor crime
by on Jul 31, 2007 03:21 PM Permalink
Very true!!! Everyone has conveniently turned a blind eye towards the real perperators of the Bombay riots.The politicians & police officials who openly engineered,incited & supported the killings of so many innocent people.While small fries are being penalised the real culprits r roaming scot-free.Does anybody knows whats happening about the Srikrishnna commission report regarding the Bombay riots???? Why aren't the persons named in the report r being brought to justice??? Or is it another case of selective justice????
