Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:15 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

1st of all the case shuldnt have been streched for so long (14 yrz) & then for these 14 yr sanju had already suffered a lott...this culd b taken as a punishment & after all he realised his mistake he turned over a new leaf & respected the laws ..this sentence can leave his family broken especially his daughter TRISHALA ....Guyz think over it after all he is also a human being & such a kind hearted person

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by abhijeet on Jul 31, 2007 08:19 PM   Permalink
yes it is too much.he should be hanged till death now.14 years are too much

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:33 PM   Permalink
hanged for what...even 6 yrz punishment was cruel enough and d thing is tat he has realised his mistake

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Ram Chauthariya on Jul 31, 2007 08:19 PM   Permalink
Yes, seems very harsh. Courts kept him hanging for 15 plus years due to their own incompetence.He never killed or threatened to hurt any one. This article is not even clear of all the charges against Sanju but possessing a gun is not worth 6 years.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Mani A C on Jul 31, 2007 08:34 PM   Permalink
Thank you for the complements. In Hinduism, we respect even dacoits who write classics. But you chaps cant stand salman rushdie or tasleema nasreen. Why; Is it because the almighy just you quaran and no brains ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by on Jul 31, 2007 09:26 PM   Permalink
And koran written by Rapist (pbuh)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by anuj kumbhat on Jul 31, 2007 08:35 PM   Permalink
did u notice the paradox...a dacoit could write an epic on nobility & goodness...guess that dacoit was better than puppets like u...who get carried away in the name of religion...let me tell u...there is no connection between god and religion...so your allah or my bhagvan doesn't hv anything to do with islam or hinduism respectively!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Mani A C on Jul 31, 2007 08:21 PM   Permalink
Everybody does have a family, not just sanjay dutt.But I guess its rejoicing a bit early because you have still have the supreme court and president left who could overturn this judgement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:31 PM   Permalink
well ofcoz evryone has a family n tatz y im saying this ...jus think abba her

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Mani A C on Jul 31, 2007 08:36 PM   Permalink
ahh...sorry buddy, now I get it !!! but is she reading this ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:47 PM   Permalink
wtt a stupid question she is in New york as told by d media

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Mani A C on Jul 31, 2007 08:55 PM   Permalink
What a stupid answer. I too am from new york.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Vipul gupta on Jul 31, 2007 08:28 PM   Permalink
Person is talented doesnt mean that he will be spared .In the eyes of law every person is same u and me or Sanjay dutt.As our stupid judicial system takes a very long time to take verdict thats Mr sanjay dutt was able to act for damm 13 years . Other wise he would in the cell for this offence

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:30 PM   Permalink
under the arms act he must b punished i agree but 6 yrz means a lott itz not jus 6 dayz

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by anuj kumbhat on Jul 31, 2007 08:40 PM   Permalink
i think if witnesses hadn't retracted....he would hv got a lifer or death! a person who keeps the explosives in his house knowing about their intended use is certainly a candidate fit for death sentence!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Himanshu eknath patil on Jul 31, 2007 08:25 PM   Permalink
why dont u advocate for other undertrials who spend years in jail??? just becos dutt is a star he cant get away with anything. as the judge said he was mature when he committed those crime. Law should be the same for everyone, me, you and Dutt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:29 PM   Permalink
OFOCZ NOT IM NOT SUPPORTING HIM BCOZ HEZ SUM SUPERSTAR OR SHULD I SAY MUNNA BHAI...BUT I SUPPORT HIM BCOZ I THINK D VERDICT WAS UNJUST I WULDNT MIND SUPPORTING OTHERZ TOO BUT THE THING IS WE DONT KNW THEIR CASE AT ALL AS I KNW THIS CASE V R TALKING...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:was a very unjust sentence
by anuj kumbhat on Jul 31, 2007 08:38 PM   Permalink
how much u know about this case other than what has been told by media? if nothing..than shut up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:was a very unjust sentence
by Niki pariani on Jul 31, 2007 08:45 PM   Permalink
as if u knw the whole story wid evry minute detail..have a heart u loser

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Sanjay Dutt gets 6 yrs in jail