This case was 15 years old. Dutt has been tortured form the last 15 years and never committed any act against the law during the period. I think, he already got enough punishment and learn a good lesson. This extended six years imprisonment is really not a right verdict for him. He suffered a lot and become good person. So don%u2019t make him criminal again by giving such a horrible punishment
RE:not a right verdict
by neil k on Jul 31, 2007 03:00 PM Permalink
what about those who got injured in the blast, are not they suffering now? what about those who died 15 years ago? are not their family suffering now?
RE:not a right verdict
by Avi Priten on Jul 31, 2007 03:06 PM Permalink
Sanjay Dutt did not kill the 275 people. so why do you guys want to link him with the 1993 riots. He only aquired prohibited weapon. but did not use it. imagine, if your family is threatened during Riots, you will protect it or just shit in your pants.
Time to change the arms act .
He visited the party when Dawwod was not a terrorist.
i think the judge has only tried to save his skin. GOD WILL DECIDE
RE:not a right verdict
by ashok pai on Jul 31, 2007 03:01 PM Permalink
imagine anyone else in his position. nobody would have cried for them. he's just being treated as a normal citizen of this country. thats perfectly fine.
RE:not a right verdict
by sandeep deokar on Jul 31, 2007 03:02 PM Permalink
u mean to say..a guy commits a rape and then during his trial doesnt do another so he should be left free...do u want to wait to punish him till he commits another act...and this act of sanjay is far worse than a rape..ask the people who lost their near and dear ones in the balst or who are maimed for life.
RE:RE:not a right verdict
by Avi Priten on Jul 31, 2007 03:08 PM Permalink
Sandeep are you a marathi? then you should read the history of Marathas, they were screwed in the Battle of Panipat.
