Dear Shilaji, I have very high respect for you. When you talk about the Shri Krishna commission report, its publication and implementation of the recommendations, I just want to ask you following questions. There are hundreds, rather thousands of commissions appointed by all state and central governments in our country. How many reports have been treated at legal "witness" by our court? why those reports have not been implemented? There are hundreds of cases where a commission is established, millions of rupees spent on them for months or years and when the report goes to State Assembly or Parliament, with a stroke of a pen, those reports are just garbaged by the ruling party, IF THEY ARE AGAINST THEIR INTEREST !!!!! And in many cases, the reports are never put before State Legislative Assembly or Parliament. What would you say about those reports? Why are you talking about only one or two or three reports? I request you to use your investigative journalism skills (learned and inherited by reverent shir Kanti Bhatt) to come forward and answer my question Regards
RE:RE:Lessons from trial
by Gautam nil on Aug 15, 2007 04:37 AM Permalink
If any govt .institutes any commission, it should be the mandatory to follow the findings of the commission without any reservation by the either the government of the immediately following government. In case of failure of such action on total recommendations, the entire costs of such forming and maintenance of such commission till the termination of such commission, should be paid by the chief minister of the state Govt. and in case of central Govt., the cost should be paid by the Prime minister from his personal money, in case of bankruptcy, can be recovered from the respective person's movable and immovable properties, in absence of which he should be imprisoned for not lesser than three years with withdrawal of his candidature for standing for any election for next ten years!
