Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
y not
by veerapuram murali dharan on Jul 28, 2007 04:51 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

i challenge the congress to appoint a muslim as the PM, HM and CMs of all teh congress ruled states...if they can do, then its the real justice to the muslim community...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:y not
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 05:16 PM   Permalink
murali,
are you a muslim? why should congress appoint heads based on their faith? do you think that is fair?

why do you forget that Kalam, a mulim, was BJP's choice for presidency? then, Najama Heptullah is BJP's candidate for vice presidency and of course who can forget Advani's love for Jinnah. LOL

BJP is a party of opportunist and manipulators.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by Prashant Halegoudar on Jul 28, 2007 05:38 PM   Permalink
of course.......... every party

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by biz Narayan on Jul 28, 2007 05:24 PM   Permalink
Why then the sickularist would go to town with hindus being communal and congress their saviour ?

For congress, the media and its faithfuls manupulate in daylight, BJP is portrayed against muslims in one election, BJP is portrayed anti hindu in another election. Poor Hajpayee !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 05:36 PM   Permalink
Media is not controlled by congress. If after Gujarat riots and inaction by BJP govts - both in state and in center, if media calls BJP anti-muslim, what's wrong with it?

Don't blame the media. They are only messengers. The real fault is with BJP's practice of communal divide.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by neeraj singh on Jul 28, 2007 07:57 PM   Permalink
dont u feel talking about muslim only is also communal. their history and acts in independent india suggests.
they do not trust or follow indian constitution. they follow muslim law board.
does any other caste has such law board. no then why muslims.
why terrorisim is linked to muslims or they act as terrorist.
bjp came to existance in 1982, got power in 2000, what before. were they not associated to terrorisim. then blame congress.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by Loan Shark on Jul 28, 2007 08:54 PM   Permalink
first, why can't you stay on subject?

yes, muslims and hindus have their own subset of laws - like the hindu marriage act .... outside these laws both hindus and muslims or even christians follow the same set of laws - for a crime committed by hindu or a muslim, the law is common. I don't know how this was related to the previous discussion, but thought I'd still educate you.

Yes, BJP came to existence in 1982 but since their success of Ram Mandir movement in late 80s, they adopted the hindutva movement which is fine by me except that you cannot divide the country and preach hatred under the banner of hinduism.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:y not
by neeraj singh on Jul 28, 2007 08:17 PM   Permalink
talking of any community is communal divide. why only talking about hindu is communal divide.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by Anand on Jul 28, 2007 06:19 PM   Permalink
I think congress is anti muslim. See neither soniya nor arjun nor sharad pawar married their daughters with a muslim. It means they are against muslim community.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:y not
by bahmophet on Jul 28, 2007 07:06 PM   Permalink
TELL DMK TO APPOINT A MOSLIM AS CM INSTEAD OF STALIN.
THEN LET US TALK OABOUT CONGRESS,

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Najma: Making the best of it