For heaven's sake, stop creating sympathy toward terror suspects by publishing such stories. This way, you are doing a disservice to the fight aginst global terrorism. Whether Haneef, an individual is guilty OR innocent is a different matter. Until he is in detention, he is a suspect and writing anything soft about him would give wrong signals. It is only when he is charged in a court of law that he is innocent until proved guilty. As for intelligence, suspect of crime until, proved innocent is the guideline. Notice the basic difference. Malarmannan
RE:Tears of Haneef
by s b on Jul 25, 2007 08:20 AM Permalink
Slow down...malarwhatever.
Learn english, but most important, learn law and logic.
1. He is in detention in Australia. How writing soft or harsh things in India will send wrong signal to prosecution/defense? 2. This is just one article sympathizing with him, there are/were so many articles condemning him. By your logic, because of those articles jury will give harsh punishment then he expected, correct? 3. The rule of law is simple - innocent till proven guilty. It is MORE true when you are charged with something.
RE:RE:Tears of Haneef
by Durgesh Srivastava on Jul 25, 2007 09:18 AM Permalink
why don't you write your full name.
If your relatives get killed by islamic attack and you stil say Haneef is innocent, it will make sense. Otherwise please be quite. We have to be harsh to terrorist. Look at what happened in Kashmir. It is worst genocide of decade and no one talks about it.
