last time bjp strived for a consensus and did not insist on its own partyman as the presidential candidate and went for kalam, a non political honuorable scientist. he was supported by all except, who put up laxmi sahagal against him.
this time the ruling coalition were chhosing from congressmen only. why? it is an accident that pra patil was chosen, after pra mukherjee, shivraj patil, su ku shinde, karan singh, arjun singh, nirmla deshpande, mohsina kidwai, mo lal vora etc were rejected by either sonia, left or mayawati.
the upa even did not support for reelection of kalam, who was the strong choice of the educated people of the country and whose name was proposed by 3rd front and seconded by nda & sekhawat. all bcoz sonia wanted only a proven loyal dynasty sycophant as the president (WHEN INDIRA WAS JAILED, PATIL ALSO COURTED ARREST AND REMAINED IN JAIL TILL INDIRA WAS IN JAIL. DURING EMERGENCY, PATIL HAD SAID THAT THE PEOPLE'S RELIGION SHOULD B FAMILY PLANNING. LET US SEE WHAT DOES SHE SAY ON FAMILY PLANNING NOW. PROBABLY SHE WILL B LOOKING TOWARDS HER BOSS SONIA FOR DIRECTIONS.).
RE:Difference between last and present election
by anish dharwadkar on Jul 22, 2007 11:51 AM Permalink
Give full power to Narendra Modi to rule the nation , Things will fall in line
RE:Difference between last and present election
by inkypinky on Jul 22, 2007 11:53 AM Permalink
MODI IS ALSO IMPOTENT FELLOW, SO HE WONT RUN OFF & LICK WHITE FOREIGN WOMEN
RE:Difference between last and present election
by inkypinky on Jul 22, 2007 12:06 PM Permalink
the constituition should be amended that only impotent or castrated indian fellows should become pm & president, because normal fellows run after to lick white women and make their children heirs to the office.
