RE:Christian
by Kaushik Das on Jul 16, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
But then, he wouldn't have provided support to terrorists, either. In fact, that way, the incident would not have happened at all.
RE:Christian
by Akram on Jul 16, 2007 04:06 PM Permalink
dont be hasty in putting comments. I dont think Australian Govt or people are so biased as you are thinking. I certainly beleive John Howard is a better ruler than Modi who involved in fake encounters for raising his popularity
RE:RE:Christian
by Kaushik Das on Jul 16, 2007 04:19 PM Permalink
If modi has done it, it is for raising security, not popularity. anyway, sohrabuddin was not exactly a role model for the public, was he?
RE:Christian
by Akram on Jul 16, 2007 04:28 PM Permalink
killing sohrabuddin as for his criminal activity can be justified. But MODI claimed he was on a mission to kill him that makes the difference. A petty criminal is not a hardcore terrorist, his muslim name made the task easy to label him terrorist and kill him thru encounter.
a person involve in riots and kill public is considered criminal and other who bombs is terrorists
