The article fails to give any empirical evidences or situations or events which could lead to the end game of Musharraf. Its allright that Musharraf is waging a war against the seminaries of Lal Qila who have now rebelled against its protectors but whose victory it shall be is a forgone conclusion as reports of their ( funadamentalist) surrender testify.
The article should have offered something new in perpsective rather than be a monologue of past events. The article fails to give any new insight.
