FROM ABHINAV TO EPSILON EPSILON EPSILON EPSILON EPSILON by PARA on Jul 03, 2007 04:07 PM | Hide replies
I have come across so many muslims in this board ........and the theme is same........as soon as a terrorist activity happens and is linked to a muslim...............they start blaming RSS / VHP / BJP / USA / UK........everything under the sun......except islam..........I think it is time for them to introspect.........and change to fit into the mainstream all over the world..........and I feel educating them is not the answer.......as clearly seen in this terrorist attack.....he was a doc.Osama is a civil engg...so forth.......
I want to ask them all - can u tell me how many bomb blasts can be attributed to RSS / VHP / BJP all over the world......then I will give u a list of bombings done by islamic radicals......
Modi - Gujarat roit would not have happened if there was no Godhara.......
USA / UK - 9/11 happened first .....and then USA started atatcking Afghanistan.......as far as US was using them to fight USSR - they were bieng payed by USA to fight ...and if they did not want to fight USA could not force them to fight ech other......
In India - noone revers Chota Rajan in Hindus.......but in Muslims Dawood and Abu Salem r treated like god (in Azamgarh in UP where Abu Salem belons - based on a PTI report).
We don't see muslims issuing a fatwa against terrorism........we dont see them protesting agains terrorism ..or asking for hanging of afzal g
RE:EPSILON - HERE ARE QUESTIONS YOU DINT ANSWER
by PARA on Jul 03, 2007 04:59 PM Permalink
Epsilon where are you? You ran away? Dont show your face in this board again.
RE:EPSILON - HERE ARE QUESTIONS YOU DINT ANSWER
by PARA on Jul 03, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (2:191), murder them and treat them harshly (9:123), slay them (9:5), fight with them (8:65 ), strive against them with great endeavor (25:52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (66:9) and strike off their heads; then after making a %u201Cwide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives%u201D for ransom (47:4).
In what context can you justify?
Muhammad was now ready to reveal the real reason behind his new Qiblah. He wanted his militants to fight for what he coveted. Qur'an 2:190 "Fight in Allah's Cause those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah like not the transgressors. (This is the first Verse revealed in connection with Jihad, it was supplemented by the 9th Surah.) Although this verse clearly orders Muslims to fight, the first of many such commands, Islamic apologists use this passage in the Western media to infer that Islamic fighting can only be defensive and moderate. Yet in context, that is not what it says. Just read the next verse: Qur'an 2:191 "And kill them wherever you find and catch them, and drive them out from where they have turned you out; for Al-Fitnah (polytheism, disbelief, oppression) is worse than slaughter." Slaying them "wherever you find and catch them" is clearly offensive, not defensive. So the prior verse has already been abrogated. And there is no moderation when one says that a belief, or even verbal abuse, is worse than
