It just says "It quoted a colleague of the man as saying he had come to Britain from Bangalore in India" and "The nationalities of the two men were not disclosed, but Beattie said the man detained had trained as a doctor in India". Nowhere else you find anything mentioned about India. And see rediff's news heading "Indian doctor arrested ...".
RE:See the difference in reporting
by vivek phanse on Jul 03, 2007 12:13 PM Permalink
I second that. No where on Australian media it says - "Indian". The agency just mentioned he studied in India.
hell with rediff and there cheap stunts to get hits!!
RE:RE:See the difference in reporting
by Haroon Ghalib on Jul 03, 2007 12:15 PM Permalink
LOL@ studied LOL must be on Dawood's scholar ship!!! own him man! just for the sake of studies pleaseeeeeeeeeeeee Sunita Williams didnt even study in india!!!! Pleaseeeeeee he must have eaten some samosa's tooo!!
RE:See the difference in reporting
by Haroon Ghalib on Jul 03, 2007 12:20 PM Permalink
just the way they implicated "pakistani hand" LOL! B Raman was crying! now he muss be hiding!as u sow so shall u reap!!
RE:See the difference in reporting
by gautham kulamarva on Jul 03, 2007 12:29 PM Permalink
BBC news website has confirmed it as a doctor of Indian origin, who was arrested in Australia.
It is customary not to disclose the identity of the detained person until some kind of proof is obtained, so that a person is not unnecessarily vilified should he turn out to be innocent.
