The entire election system may be modified. The conditions may be as follows: 1.The age limit of 55 may be put for MPs & MLAs,so that youngesters can get to lead the country with young men. 2.They contestants may be given chance once in a life time, so that others can be accommodate. 3.Before filing their nominations, their assets should be declared and verified. After completion of their term, again verified. 4. Only two parties system may be introduced to avoid divide and rule policy. 5.In case of change of party,death, resignation, the next highest vote achiever may be placed on his seat instead of conducting fresh election. 6.The living expenses of elected MPs,MLAs and leaders may be curtailed to avoid unncessary wasting of public money. 7. The election expenses may be curtalied and rules may be simplified. 8. The elected party should complete its complete the term and they cannot demand for conducting fresh election. (ismailsk)
RE:Need of third front
by faiz siddiqui on Feb 27, 2007 07:08 PM Permalink
and on and on and on...guyz we cant zet rulez for everything...the rule muzt be zimple...lock-up all party politicianz...and throw away the key...elect only independant politicianz who have had no pazt party affiliatinz...need to make india independant again...only purn zwaraj...inquilab zindabad...
RE:Need of third front
by shawaji bhosale on Feb 28, 2007 03:32 AM Permalink
You mean MODIfied? Anyone here read this news? What say Sonia Gandhi lead Rajiv Gandhi Foundation? Didnt you read this story in Economic times? Ofcourse our secular media hates to publish such stories even they are originally sensational as Sonia's organizatios praising Modi is unbelieveable. But its simple truth and truth is always bitter for secular people, so they enjoy supressing it. Few papers like Economiic Times published it in back pages somehwre. Read what RGF found after careful study.......
Rajiv Gandhi Foundation finds Gujarat No 1 state Author: Publication: The Economic Times Date: May 20, 2005 The Narendra Modi brand of governance has got an unexpected endorsement. The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, headed by Sonia Gandhi, has adjudged Modi's Gujarat as the Number 1 state in economic freedom index. A study 'Economic Freedom for States of India' carried out by the Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies, the foundation's think-tank, has come to this conclusion after analysing "economic freedom" in different states of India. The study has defined economic freedom as "absence of goverment coercion or constraint in the production, distribution or consumption of goods and services beyond the extent necessary for citizens to protect and maintain liberty by itself". In other words, the foundation does not agree that individual liberty is under threat in Mr Modi's Gujarat. The study is all praise for Gujarat, as it grades state governments on its political decision-making; the extent to which justice is served; levels of corruption; and the extent of regulation in the labour market. The study, which has taken into account the size of government, security of property rights and regulation of credit and business has said that Gujarat comes on top. On the size of goverment, Gujarat comes in the first position. For, only a small share of the GSDP is accounted for by government services. Here, the government has a small role as subsidiser. Power subsidies are among the lowest in Gujarat. In what could be a discomforting finding for the Congress and the Left, the RGF study says: "Safety of life is an essential component (of economic freedom). Gujarat, AP, Tamil Nadu, Haryana and MP have a very small share of the total crimes being accounted for by violent crimes. This share is much higher in J&K, UP, Jharkhand, Bihar and Assam, where murder, rape, kidnapping, abduction, riots, arson and dowry deaths are more rampant". The findings do not end here. "In Gujarat, Chattisgarh, Rajasthan and MP (all BJP ruled) a large share of the cases that are taken up by the police are ensured complete investigation, unlike in West Bengal, Punjab, Bihar, Jharkhand and Assam". Also,"in Gujarat, least number of mandays are lost as a result of strikes and lockout as a ratio of total industrial workers in the state". Gujarat's liberal licence regime has also come for praise in the report. "Constraints on trade imposed by market and license fees were also included in economic freedom. Corruption is also seen to be relatively low in Modi's Gujarat. "In Gujarat, AP, Maharashtra, a smaller share of the total cases resgistered are pending investigation." "Gujarat, AP, Maharashtra and Haryana exhibited low minimum license fee for traders". "Corruption is measured in terms of cases pending investigation as a ratio of total cases registered under Prevention of Corruption and related acts. In Gujarat, AP, Maharashtra, a smaller share of the total cases resgistered are pending investigation. The situation, however, is bleak in West Bengal, J&K, HP, Jharkhand and Bihar".
RE:Need of third front
by Jessica Monteiro on Feb 27, 2007 06:34 PM Permalink
What about educational background of the MPs??? Can be have a minimum criteria???
RE:RE:RE:Need of third front
by Kaushik Basu on Feb 28, 2007 02:57 AM Permalink
You degrees can be taken of the markets, Laloo is a grad so is Mulayam I am not sure about Mayawati. What do you say about that?
