Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by Piyush Bhargava on Feb 21, 2007 03:11 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

These guys will keep frying our arses and our politicians will keep getting an opportunity to appear on television giving idiotic statements.Burn the dhotis of the politicians and send them to Pakistan.Maybe they can emmulate Hanumanji.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by Devang Dani on Feb 20, 2007 10:10 PM   Permalink
Piyush,
I understand your sentiments but please don't compare these spineless and good-for-nothin politicians with Hanumanji. They don't have and courage. If their dhotis are set on fire they will remove the dhoti and drown themselves in "chullu bhar pani" but would never dare to punish the real culprits.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by Sameer Pawar on Feb 21, 2007 12:16 AM   Permalink
BRAVO !!!!! BRAVO !!!!! BRAVO !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by rajesh bhaskar on Feb 20, 2007 09:39 PM   Permalink
Funny
islam is religon of peace? islam means to submission to god, not related to peace
say one thing what is not in hindu vedas which in quran.
don't think no hindus no quran. every religion has good texts and bad text whihc is sutiable to the then era. mohammed was peaceful man during his early stages then a warrior. do you know hwy he killed by jewsih women.
as castism and other bad ritual were among hindus, which are not scritps of vedas, similary muslims have a lot of customs. throwing stones in kabba, worship moon god as allah, having moon symbol on top of mosques, worshipping a black stone in mecca. his followers killed and ruined many places and temples and buddhist shirnes every where in the world. so don't say islam is religion of peace.
1. Jews where killed by Germans in millions, but Jews won't blow themselve up in germany
2. budhhists were killed in afghan ,pakishan and many places by islamic propogaters. what religion is it.
3. now kashmir, is it a freedom struggle?
don't sanctify islam and text. previous days no body knows arabic but we learn now, that is why salman rushdie came satanic versus, that is tasleema came with lajja, so dn't bluff.
if muslims think they can conquer the world and rule and spread islam, that will be end of world. regarding fastest growing religion, islam is just mass production factory where women is treated as such.
and conversion to islam , for money many converts , for multiple marriages many converts, but niether christian or jew or hindu kills the convert , they give them freedom to convert, but what about if islam if a mulsim want to convert to hindu or christian you will kill those. that is what is said in quran itself. is that peace man.
so tell your quran to terrorist rather than converting many. 70% muslims are under poverty line uplift them before you say it is a religion of peace, people will follow always good, but not thru sword in one hand quran in another.
your scripts make the world worst and if it is good teach it muslims first.old days of mohammedian invaders are gone. now this will be war of nuclear man. throw the script away and be human, let me practise mine you pactise yours
if you claim your better i have thousands of example within quran with quoted suras to say it is not a religion of peace



Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by Razzaq ahmed on Feb 21, 2007 01:54 AM   Permalink
A great joke by

MR. Abul Hassan

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by sahi on Feb 20, 2007 10:23 PM   Permalink
Most of mohammad's wives were widows whose husbands were killed by muslims. No wonder they had to convert and some even had to marry him.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by Sameer Pawar on Feb 20, 2007 08:42 PM   Permalink
I totally agree with you. The politicians have ruined India. The country with the richest heritage, culture, history and ethnic is now a country that a total mess. I left India because its a place not meant for humans. I will be so happy if the pakistanis drop a bomb on the parliment and eradicate these politicians in one go.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Samjhauta attack: A dangerous precedent
by vivek kulkarni on Feb 20, 2007 07:45 PM   Permalink
We do not deserve to blame polititions. They are elected by us then why dont people take more care electing them? India is a country where we elect unqualified forign lady just becase she married some one in Gandhi family. Now she controls the country , she wont take strong action against terrorirists.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Train attack:Dangerous precedent