If Aurangazeb(R.A) was so cruel....then no hindu would have been left on this earth. We Indians are good at manipulating the history. What proof can anyone provide that he has destroyed the temples...its just another tactic to say that Indians can be divided easily by digging the past and people like politicians and foreigners can rule on us and give more pain than what you think like Aurangazeb(R.A) as done.
Wake up and help one another and help develop our country.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 09:51 PM Permalink
And it also highlights that Conversion to Islam makes one dumb, whol;ly illogical.
Its a NEUROTIC JOURNEY WHERE INVADER SUDDENLY BECOMES THE SAVIOUR!
90% of Indian Muslims were force converted. However, after conversion to Islam, they behave in such a way, brainwashed they START SEEING THE CULPRIT AS SAVIOUR!
RE:shah
by Dr_Ramanand Rao on Mar 09, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
Sanathana Dharma/Hinduism was not wiped out because of help from time to time by Gurus and Yogis - the Saptarishi, Raghavendra Swami, Sant Tukaram etc. The farmaans Aurangzeb issued to destroy temples can be seen by one and all in the museums Gautier mentioned - no manipulation happened here.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 10:08 PM Permalink
They very fact you have put RA after Arrangjeb's name and put the word "Indian" at the bottom is a sheer hypocracy.
RA is used in Islamic context to show respect to somebody.
Here is a zealot who raised 100s of temples, Stupas, introduced Ziziya and was most brutal to indigeneous people (including your forefathers).
Its this mind set to erase atrocities perpetrated by people who have no relation with Indian Muslims except nominally on religion WHICH CREATE PROBLEM IN INDIA.
Psuedos allowed this to continue for so long. HOWEVER BE ASSURED, PEOPLE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS ANYMORE.
No version of secularism can save those who want to show respect to person like Aurangjeb, the most fundamentalist ruler of Mughal era.
RE:shah
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Mar 05, 2007 09:48 PM Permalink
Islamic rule erased ALL indigeneous civilization, converted people by force EXCEPT India where they failed NOT because they were good, but Hindus were too many, too powerful.
Look at what happens under Islamic rule in Paki land and Bangladesh which for all practical purpose is part of Indian history for last 5000 years.
RE:shah
by Ramesh P on Mar 07, 2007 05:14 AM Permalink
Pak got independence in 1947, hindus were 28% then, now its 1.2%. Bangla got independence in 1971, hindus were 30% then and now they are 6%. The present day muslims are worse then Aurangzeb and no wonder the present day muslims see aurangzeb as good (he is better than them infact).
