Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
84 roits
by gurpreet johar on Feb 17, 2007 11:03 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

This message is to the Author of the article...
It is true what happened in aurangzeb's time was not right but what happened in 84 riots was even 100 times worse can we discuss what lead to that openly ...as a Sikh who understands mughal history well i can say there is a need to discuss what happened in independent india , including the partition and exploitation of relgn by politicians or the role of congress party

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:84 roits
by Nagesh on Feb 17, 2007 11:08 PM   Permalink
Hey here the issue is how politicians /i.e indira Gandhi, who herself married a muslim -- a muslim sympathizer greedy for muslims votes killed sikhs.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:84 roits
by Mahesh Sampat on Feb 17, 2007 11:41 PM   Permalink
Feroz Gandhi was a parsi..& not a muslim stupid! Don't mislead people.Say what you want but let it be the truth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Nagesh on Feb 18, 2007 12:05 AM   Permalink
So Feroze Khan ,son of nawab khan is not a muslim. What matters more her is Indira Gandhi who craved for muslims votes at the cost of teh diginity of this nation

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Indian Muslim on Feb 18, 2007 12:24 AM   Permalink
If indeed he was a muslim , she would have got more votes if he had kept his name as Feroz Khan rather than Feroz Gandhi ?... doesnt it ??

She did not have to crave for muslim votes. they voted for her anyway! Pathetic Vote-Bank!

Your logic is flawed!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:84 roits
by Indian Muslim on Feb 17, 2007 11:12 PM   Permalink
Feroze Gandhi was a muslim ?? Wow!!

Nagesh, in one of your posts you say that you use intellect.

Feroz Gandhi was a parsi.

Pity you :(

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Cyber hinwa on Feb 17, 2007 11:21 PM   Permalink
FEROZ WAS A MUSLIM AND HE WAS FORCED BY NEHRU WHO ON INSISTINCE OF GANDHI FORCED THE MUSLIM GROCER TO CHANGE HIS SURNAME BY GIVING A AFIDAVIT IN THE COURT OF LAW OR IT WOULD HAVE CAUSED RIOTS . INDIRA WAS ADAMANT ON MARRYING HIM AFTER SHE WAS KICKED OUT FROM THE RABINDRANATH TAGORE 'S SHANTINIKETAN , WHERE SHE WAS CAUGHTVIN A COMPROMISING POSITION WITH A MAN SERVANT .

BRUSH UP YOUR HISTORY AND FORGET WHAT IS PARROTTED BY CONGRESS .............

CLEAR UP YOUR COWBWEB IN THE BRAIN SIR

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Indian Muslim on Feb 17, 2007 11:31 PM   Permalink
Forced by Nehru ?

Caught in Compromising position?

Of all people with a man servant?

Being a woman labelling another woman as a ....

just to hate muslims?? Not a good cause!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by anita r on Feb 18, 2007 12:08 AM   Permalink
See this is why people think Hindu
Right - Wingers are so stupid..........because they are. Any piece of mis-information fed to you by the RSS or VHP is taken by you as the Gospel truth. I received a mail on the eve of the last elections which contained all this 'information' about how Indira Gandhi had married a Muslim and how there was a 'conpiracy' to hide this and so on. Any person with half a brain can tell you it's not true. Feroz Gandhi was very much a Parsi. His sister and relatives still live in Bombay and are involved in various activities for Parsis.
Even if Indira Gandhi had married a Muslim, it would make no difference to the people of this country who do not form opinions of people simply based on their religion. There is a difference between being a patriot and a narrow-feeble-minded-bigoted zealot, you are the one who needs to read History and proper History written by people with proper credentials.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:84 roits
by gurpreet johar on Feb 17, 2007 11:31 PM   Permalink
nagesh
understand this indira gandhi was dead when 84 riots happened. plus it was ordinary people who picked put tyres around innocent people and burnt them, each one of them as cruel as aurangzeb..how many of them were hindus and how many muslims i dont have a count...but the truth is none of them has been convicted....if aurangzeb need to be told than 84 needs to be told at least 100 times

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Nagesh on Feb 17, 2007 11:37 PM   Permalink
Gurpreet
I absolutely love sikhism just like buddhism,jainism which have its origins in this great land. What I was trying to point those people are reacting to the death of stupid political leader who has done disservice to this great nation . It is not a problem between hindus and sikhs nor it is motivated by religious hatred.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:84 roits
by Nagesh on Feb 17, 2007 11:41 PM   Permalink
I totally agree it is shameful to murder innocent brothers reacting to the murder of a stupid politician like her. I agree this should be discussed a 100 times.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:84 roits
by abdul shakib on Feb 17, 2007 11:08 PM   Permalink
I completely appreciate ur thoughts, Mr.Johar.

People like u r the ones needed in India

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb