RE:CONVERSION IN THE HISTORY
by zaheen usmani on Mar 27, 2007 09:07 PM Permalink
Most of the conversion in India has been taken place by Khawaja moinuddin chishti it is said even one lac people converted in one day by him,where every day Hindus and Muslim go to pay homage on his grave at Ajmer.Infact it is sangh parivar propaganda that Aurangzeb forcily converted people they can not blame khaja moinuddin chishty since Hindus to respect him and if they do so again a wave of conversion can start by Hindus to get self respect and free from clutches of upper caste
RE:CONVERSION IN THE HISTORY
by wada pav on Mar 27, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti's mazaar is located in what was a destroyed hindu temple. so don't tell about ur crooked saints.
RE:CONVERSION IN THE HISTORY
by Mayur Punekar on Mar 27, 2007 06:34 PM Permalink
- i think you are still not able to understand what author is saying. "Accept History" thats most important thing. What you are saying is same as what your brother Ahmadinejad (Iran's so called president) has said your Holocaust. No one has any doubt about existence of Holocaust in west, including Germans who accepts that their ancestors have commited such horrific crime and still your brother Ahmadinejad says it never happend.
- Similarly, some historians with prejudice in mind try to distort the facts about Muslim kings.
- For moment forget about Aurangzeb and can you please tell me who destroyed Nalanda Univeristy and why??
- If you don't know, it is a known fact it was destroyed by soldiers of Allauddin Khilji. And why?? I think its better you answer this. Or you are also not ready to accept this fact?? Or do u think its again a myth propagated by RSS???
- once again ACCPECT HISTORY.
- One more example of tolerance of muslims from ancient Iran. Why persians with Zoroastrian religion run away from Iran and come to India?? please answer this question. Again its a known fact that Muslim invaders didn't gave any religious freedom to there salves. Again are you ready to accept this fact or not??
- also use your own name (if you dare to use it!!), please don't use authors name. You are misleading other readers by doing this.
RE:RE:CONVERSION IN THE HISTORY
by Jeffrey Mittal on Mar 27, 2007 06:52 PM Permalink
Why accept history
Misleading is what it is all about.
By creating confusion and quoting or fabricating some theories, they want to try and embarass the Hindus to accept Aurangazeb or modern day Jihadis as kind, peace loving people.(so what if a few thousand innocents get killed by their actions)
What hypocrisy!
Just by blaming the caste system, among other things, Francoise (pathetic pseudo)Ekalavyan, Mike etc. you can not make fools of the readers of this board.
They have the intelligence to sort out the bashing that you are trying to inflict.
RE:CONVERSION IN THE HISTORY
by wada pav on Mar 27, 2007 07:04 PM Permalink
They are following the principle of constant denial and 'Attack is the best form of defence' they are also trying to team up with dalits to portray themselves as victims.while dalits were truly victims,these bas***ds are perpetrators not victims.
RE:[object]
by wada pav on Mar 27, 2007 07:06 PM Permalink
and they are cut-pasting same articles hundreds of times,because they have no defence left. that too under different misguiding names like 'Mike Gandhi' and 'Francoise Gautiere'
