Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by Amar Deep on Feb 19, 2007 04:35 PM   Permalink | Hide replies


The truth is man has a gene related to the alpha male, Which means he needs to be the Top is the Social heirarchy, wants Money, Power and Women. Similar to Alpha Male in Animal Kingdom.

Now to get there what he does is :
Man: Uses Religion, Weapon, Pen, Speech.
Animal: Uses Dances, Fights, Mocks, Noises.

Man has a Choice by nature SPEECH which can be more peaceful.

HATE AND VIOLENCE IS MORE WITH BIOLOGY THAN WITH THEOLOGY.

JIHAD is to KIll the GENE OF DOMINANCE AND HATE IN ONES own SELF.

ALL RELIGIONS DONT AGREE WITH EACH OTHER SO NO NEED TO A DIALOGUE AMONG THEM.

A PANDIT NEEDS HINDUS: CAUSE HE CAN SURVIVE ON GRANTS PAID BY HINDUS.
A MULLAH NEEDS MUSLIMS CAUSE HE CAN SURVIVE ON GRANTS PAID BY MUSLIMS.
A FATHER NEEDS CHRISTIANS CAUSE HE CAN SURVIVE ON GRANTS PAID BY Christians.



SO DONT FIGHT LIKE ANIMALS, GO BACK TO YOUR WORK AND HEAD MANKIND TO COLONIZE SPACE.
EVERY PENNY YOU EARN WILL HELP MAN KIND.

REMEMBER DARWINS THEORY:SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST.
IS MAN SO CONFIDENT THAT HE HAS ALREADY WON?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by fahad mohd on Feb 19, 2007 05:04 PM   Permalink
Dear, darwin's theory has already been rejected by many a scientific facts. Remember, it's a theory (an unproved one at that) and disporoved with facts by many.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by Amar Deep on Feb 19, 2007 05:22 PM   Permalink
Im sure Mr Fahad has failed in Primary education and thereon, Since you had to understand only religion and not Science.
You can only be a cyber savvy less literate candidate.
At least encourage your Children to do their Homework well.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by Qamar on Feb 19, 2007 06:58 PM   Permalink
Hi Amar,
Your attitude seems to be very nice; over that your language is most polite; I have lot of interest in science;
I would love if you can give exact picture about what was there in the universe before BIG-BANG, and why does the Big bang happend;
becase time start from minus infinity to plus infinity; certainly when big bang happend it was not minus infinnity time.
Regards
Qamar


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by Secular Indian on Feb 20, 2007 04:04 AM   Permalink
In reality it has nothing to do with evolution (atleast not directly) however I digress. Let me first start with what the Rig Veda says, if we you can comprehend the subtlety expressed in the verse then there is still hope for you:

Creation Hymn

A time is envisioned when the world was not, only a watery chaos (the dark, "indistinguishable sea") and a warm cosmic breath, which could give an impetus of life. Notice how thought gives rise to desire (when something is thought of it can then be desired) and desire links non-being to being (we desire what is not but then try to bring it about that it is). Yet the whole process is shrouded in mystery.

Where do the gods fit in this creation scheme?

The non-existent was not; the existent was not at that time. The atmosphere was not nor the heavens which are beyond. What was concealed? Where? In whose protection? Was it water? An unfathomable abyss?

There was neither death nor immortality then. There was not distinction of day or night. That alone breathed windless by its own power. Other than that there was not anything else.

Darkness was hidden by darkness in the beginning. All this was an indistinguishable sea. That which becomes, that which was enveloped by the void, that alone was born through the power of heat.

Upon that desire arose in the beginning. This was the first discharge of thought. Sages discovered this link of the existent to the nonexistent, having searched in the heart with wisdom.

Their line [of vision] was extended across; what was below, what was above? There were impregnators, there were powers: inherent power below, impulses above.

Who knows truly? Who here will declare whence it arose, whence this creation? The gods are subsequent to the creation of this. Who, then, knows whence it has come into being?

Whence this creation has come into being; whether it was made or not; he in the highest heaven is its surveyor. Surely he knows, or perhaps he knows not.

Now what the current state of research on this rather fascinating subject has to say:

According to Einstein%u2019s general theory of relativity, the Big Bang represents The Beginning, the grand event at which not only matter but space-time itself was born. While classical theories offer no clues about existence before that moment, a research team at Penn State has used quantum gravitational calculations to find threads that lead to an earlier time.
%u201CGeneral relativity can be used to describe the universe back to a point at which matter becomes so dense that its equations don%u2019t hold up,%u201D says Abhay Ashtekar, Holder of the Eberly Family Chair in Physics and Director of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Penn State. %u201CBeyond that point, we needed to apply quantum tools that were not available to Einstein.%u201D By combining quantum physics with general relativity, Ashtekar and two of his post-doctoral researchers, Tomasz Pawlowski and Parmpreet Singh, were able to develop a model that traces through the Big Bang to a shrinking universe that exhibits physics similar to ours.

In research reported in the current issue of Physical Review Letters, the team shows that, prior to the Big Bang, there was a contracting universe with space-time geometry that otherwise is similar to that of our current expanding universe. As gravitational forces pulled this previous universe inward, it reached a point at which the quantum properties of space-time cause gravity to become repulsive, rather than attractive.

%u201CUsing quantum modifications of Einstein%u2019s cosmological equations, we have shown that in place of a classical Big Bang there is in fact a quantum Bounce,%u201D says Ashtekar. %u201CWe were so surprised by the finding that there is another classical, pre-Big Bang universe that we repeated the simulations with different parameter values over several months, but we found that the Big Bounce scenario is robust.%u201D

While the general idea of another universe existing prior to the Big Bang has been proposed before, this is the first mathematical description that systematically establishes its existence and deduces properties of space-time geometry in that universe.

The research team used loop quantum gravity, a leading approach to the problem of the unification of general relativity with quantum physics, which also was pioneered at the Penn State Institute of Gravitational Physics and Geometry. In this theory, space-time geometry itself has a discrete 'atomic' structure and the familiar continuum is only an approximation. The fabric of space is literally woven by one-dimensional quantum threads. Near the Big-Bang, this fabric is violently torn and the quantum nature of geometry becomes important. It makes gravity strongly repulsive, giving rise to the Big Bounce.

"Our initial work assumes a homogenous model of our universe," says Ashtekar. "However, it has given us confidence in the underlying ideas of loop quantum gravity. We will continue to refine the model to better portray the universe as we know it and to better understand the features of quantum gravity."


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:BIOLOGICAL SENSE To THEOLOGIAL QUESTION
by Sameer K on Feb 19, 2007 09:53 PM   Permalink
And he can also tell you how to make Bombs and explode to kill humanity, I think you forget this point.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb