whatever aurangazeb did was to convert forcefully or damage temples.whereas modi and the gujarathis who live in this 21 century killed muslims barbaricaly in gujarath .the simple truth is that if our historians say that he converted forcefully then our country would be muslim majority since he ruled most part of the country in differnt times.our saffronised historians and politicians just want to justify their action in their own interest.whoever read the quran i am sure he shall know the truth.a true muslim wont do forcefull conversion.read quran before.its a eyeopener
RE:dont just
by BALASUBRAMANIAN VISWANATHAN on Feb 17, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
Sure u need to be proud of ur ancestor. Blood is thicker than water.Remember India was fully Hindustan before Mughals invaded & devasted thousands of temples & killed lakhs of Hindus.Even now thousands of temples stand ravaged with the idols desecrated without limbs, hands, heads etc tell the story.Maybe the descendants are not fully satisfied & hence have taken up terrorism to achieve the dreams of the ancestors. But truth will always prevail.
RE:dont just
by vishal kundnani on Feb 17, 2007 03:10 PM Permalink
Let me see you condemn this if you live in SECULAR INDIA, and you call yourself SECULAR INDIAN.
URGENT NEWS: Government of Kazakhstan demolishes cottages in Hindu community
RE:dont just
by Jaganniwas Iyer on Feb 17, 2007 03:41 PM Permalink
Spoken like a true member of your faith, Ahmed. And don't try to sell us this baloney about Aurangzeb. As for Gujarat, you seem to have a very 'convenient' memory. I mean, you speak as if the poor Muslims were innocent and Hindus alone are monsters. What happened in Gujarat was a just punishment for the barbarism your co-religionists inflicted on innocent Hindus at Godhra, for which Hindus taught the jihadis a real lesson. Spare us your sermons. And by the way, Aurangzeb failed not because of want of trying. It's just that he and his thugs couldn't handle the Hindu military resurgence. Jaganniwas Iyer
