Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
The Truth - Eye Opener -
by rafiuddin farooqui on Mar 20, 2007 05:30 AM   Permalink | Hide replies





Quote

Aurangzeb was driven by an intense Muslim piety. He insisted that the Shari'a(Mistaken or wrongly got He just make Just rule and given 148 highest position to Hindus in Judiciary to deal the cases) become the law of the land, and forbade all drinking and gambling. The Hindu majority, accustomed to living according to Hindu law, the Dharmashastra , now found themselves facing Islamic law courts. Aurangzeb outlawed the Hindu practice of suttee in which widows voluntarily killed themselves by throwing themselves on the funeral pyre of their husbands. More seriously, however, was Aurangzeb's repeal of all taxes that were not specifically authorized in Islamic law or tradition

Unquote



Aurangzeb is become wicked to the Brahmans and Higher Castes Hindus, because he had started reformation and applied correcting measures to Hindu society and Culture. In his rule recorded that many Temple and Ashram which runs as Brothels closed. The Gambling, Drinking and other practices Devdasi, Slavery was banned. He initiated reformation that made villain to Brahmans and Higher Castes. Because Aurangzeb wanted to liberate BC/ST/SC and Dalit from the clutches and wrong practices of Brahmans and Higher Castes and bring equality. The all filth written in the History by Western Writers, come from where. By these RSS and GANGS and Goons work. They Gave Vish Kanniya and Rewards to write against Aurangzeb and they also wrote books, brochure against him to spread hatred. They want to use now. This was the strategy. The forced conversion, razing temples, killing Hindus all were fabricated and heinous work of these hatred mongers. They want to rule India by encouraging hatred against Muslims. Encouraging Hatred against could not unite Hindus. The only thing is Revolution which is a step ahead.

Note: The Francois Gautier is bogus writer.

1. Any student he wants to study about Aurangzeb he must read the FARMANS (Edict of Aurangzeb GOVERNMETN ORDERS) the basic documents.

2. Mr. Francois Gautier claims he studied 30 years Indian history with specialization Aurangzeb. He wrote in the article he got FARHANS. ( You can find and Guess from where he get these farhans )

From his Article:

Firstly, I have been a close student of Indian history, and one of its most controversial figures has been Aurangzeb (1658-1707).

History (like journalism) is about documentation and first-hand experience. We decided to show Aurangzeb according to his own documents. There are an incredible number of farhans, original edicts of Aurangzeb hand-written in Persian, in India's museums, particularly in Rajasthan, such as the Bikaner archives.

The director of Bikaner archives told us that in 50 years we were the first ones asking for the farhans dealing with Aurangzeb's destructive deeds.

We encountered resistance, sometimes downright hostility and we had to go once to

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:The Truth - Eye Opener -
by Secular Indian on Mar 20, 2007 05:45 AM   Permalink
Face up to the truth! Some of your claims are bizarre, a sample:

"The all filth written in the History by Western Writers, come from where. By these RSS and GANGS and Goons work. They Gave Vish Kanniya and Rewards to write against Aurangzeb"

How do you explain this ?

Aurangzeb was a religious bigot and actively promoted forced conversions of Hindus to Islam. By passing discriminatory laws based on the Shariat he created the conditions for his administrators to actively pursue his forced conversion agenda. He didn't go from house to house to convert people he didn't need to his job was to create the conditions within which he plan would be implemented, thats what rulers do.

e.g.,

From "The Mughal Empire", John F. Richards. Pg. 176

Zealous imperial officers had considerable power to enforce the new edicts, especially among the urban non-warrior groups. At Suray in 1669 the qazi terrorized the entire Bania or Hindu merchant community of that city. He pressured several members of the community to convert to Islam and threatened others with forcible conversions unless they paid ransom money. He extorted other sums to prevent defacement of the Hindu temples and shrines in the city. The qazi forcibly circumsized and converted a Bania serving as a Persian writer or clerk, who then killed himself. At this point there was a mass protest: "all heads of the Banian families of what condition whatsoever departed the Town to the number of 8000 leaving their wives and children in Surat under charge of their brothger or next of Kinn".

Regarding Jizya ...

.. the Hindus crowded from the gate to the fort to the Jama Masjid in large numbers to for imploring redress ... [Aurangzeb], who was riding on an elephant, could not reach the mosque...Then he ordered the majestic elephants should proceed against them. Some of them [Hindus] were killed ... at last then submitted to pay the Jiziyah.

Aurangzeb's ultimate aim was conversion of non-Muslims to Islam. Whenever possible the emperor gave out robes of honor, cash gifts, and promotions to converts. It quickly became known that conversions was a sure way to the empeor's favor.. In many disputed successions for hereditary local office Aurangzeb chose candidates who had converted to Islam over the rivals. Pragana headmen and qanungos or recordkeepers were targeted especially for pressure to convert.

Regarding Hindus serving for Mughal emperors especially Aurangzeb.

These were alliances of convenience (in fact Indians should take note what happens when they fight amongst themselves). Aurangzeb had made the titles hereditary and the Hindu Zamindars wanted to legitimise their rule. Tactically this was a smart move by Aurangzeb to get the Hindus rulers into his orbit by getting them onside and then sorting them out one by one, divide and

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb