Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Syed Quadri on Feb 28, 2007 05:27 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

We all know Aurangzeb has done injustice to his own brothers, father and many muslim saints. Leave alone Hindus or other rulers.



Why do Britishers or christians or americans point out only temples with some of their own additions and new concocted stories.



There are still people to this day in Maharashtra who are hindus and were jagirdars, police patels and ministers during the times of Aurangzeb.



There were so many injustices done to muslims after independence and during police action, which, no historian dares to write.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Feb 28, 2007 08:13 PM   Permalink
Quadri Bhai: People of India are most tolerant of others. Hardly any people have problem with "Islam as religion". Even the author ends this piece with praises for Dara Sikoh..



However, nobody can deny that Indians underwent huge atrocities during medieval period, specially under Aurangjeb.



What he did was NOT Indian Islam. Its still continuing today in Kashmir, Pakistam Bangladesh. Its of Arabic Fundamentalism. Wahabi and Deobondi.



Patritic Indian Muslims must understand this and condemn the acts of muslim emperors. They WERE FROM OUTSIDE INDIA, UNLIKE MOST INDIAN MUSLIMS WHO ARE FROM INDIA.



Psuedos will instigate Muslims, agitate youfolks for vote - BUT IT HAS REACHED ITS LIMIT. Now a Hindu backlash, specially after terrorism spreading all over India, taking place.





   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Secular Indian on Mar 01, 2007 06:02 AM   Permalink
Deobandi is very much an indigenous ideology.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Feb 28, 2007 08:21 PM   Permalink
The REAL REASON why Hindus and Muslims lived in Harmony in India for so long BECAUSE THEY SHARED SPACE LIKE MAZARs, THEY MEET EACH OTHER IN THE MARKET PLACE, BAZAARS.



Muslims are shunning those places now, because of fundamnetalism growing like Wahabis/Deobondis want to erase Indian Islam.



psuedo secularists have NO CLUE HOW TOLERANCE WORKS. THEY ARE MOSTLY CITY DWELLERS, NEVER LIVED IN VILLAGES, NEVER SEEN HOW THIS TOLERANCE WORKED.



SICK SECULARISTS ONLY AGENDA IS TO DEMONIZE HINDUISM, HINDU CULTURE and ERASE INDIAN CULTURE FROM PUBLIC LIFE.



THIS HAS CAUSED BIGGEST DAMAGE TO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THESE 2 COMMUNITIES.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Perv Sharma on Mar 01, 2007 07:07 AM   Permalink
Quadri Bhai



When Islamic people started forcefull conversion the first people to migrate from Iran were the parsi and these people came as refugees at that time towards India only because their ancestors knew that they practice their religion peacefully. Till today long before the muslims these people along with jews and christians have lived in different parts of India peacefully. They have followed their religion without fear. But what's the problem with muslims. Just simple greed which they have inherited from Abraham servant's son. The Maid servant was kicked out along with her son for demanding more than she was worth. The demands looks like are in the genes.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Re: Divide n rule policy of europeans and americans
by Perv Sharma on Mar 01, 2007 07:45 PM   Permalink
Quadri Bhai



In Maharashtra? You are right.



But unfortunately at that point of time Aurangzeb didn't know that Shivaji had taken birth and that shivaji and his family Marathas would make him go round and round and round the mountains of Maharashtra(I think going round and round must have reminded Aurangzeb of Going to mecca)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb