Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
real history
by Samir Ankalikar on Feb 17, 2007 10:48 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

it is wrong to say that only aurangzeb was cruel. even his forefathers were no angels.
Akbar , Jahangir and Shahjahan were equally cruel but the opposite has been
taught in history books.
Aurangzeb is remembered for his atrcocities because he was the last powerful mughal emperor.
if Akbar , jahangir and Shahjahan were tolerant , then were people like Rana Pratap or sikh Gurus like Argan Dev and Teghbahadur mad to oppose them ?
also never has any muslim ruler built any mosque or garden or fort.
if so there is no existing islamic book like Vastu Shastra just as hindus have.
Existing structures were conquered and used by these barbarians and in history it has been noted as follows:
"Shahjahan built tajmahal" or "Akbar built fatehpur sikri".
it has now been proved that TajMahal was a Hindu temple and existed when Babur arrived in India.
( Babur was an ancestor of Shahjahan ). if Shahjahan could construct a huge building like Taj after his wife's death, then why did he not make any bigger buildings for her when she was alive.
i dont know why our governments are so shy in accepting the fact that the 1000 year muslim rule in India was worse than the Nazi occupation of Poland or Russia.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:real history
by Irfan Khan on Feb 17, 2007 11:20 AM   Permalink
If the mughals rule was so bad then today 100 crore Hindus not live in India today. If they are so cruel then they convert all the hindus why akbar not convert jodhabai. If The Taj Mehal is temple then shahjahan did the good thing to convert into the Taj Mahal Because today at least we have One wonder of the world in India if there is Temple like Khajuraho who whi will going to see.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:real history
by dr neerja kamal on Feb 17, 2007 11:29 AM   Permalink
Your ans itself tells what islam is like. while a hindu can go to mosque &say its prayer not many muslims can do this & you are accepting this, which is good . atleas you are trying not to name islamic terrorist organisations which everyone knows anyway. by the way hinduism never teaches us against any other religion & hello we are talking about buildings of India ok so please keep your sarcasm of eiffel tower to yourself. SHUKRIYA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb