I have a question for the organiser of this exhibition. Why is the organiser pointing out the destruction of temples of the then times? If so, why not showing off the faces of millions of hindu who destructed the BABRI Masjid openly. Why not organise something to show who exactly did it? It was done so openly and even supreme court is not able to take the decision. Why the heck is the organiser blaming aurangzeb for destruction of temples of that time. Who know who did it that time, but today we all know who destructed the babri masjid. Why arent they accusing those people then? I need the answer of it. No offenses pls.
RE:why point destruction
by NegiA1 on Feb 17, 2007 01:34 PM Permalink
A wrong deed is a wrong deed, whether in the present or past, u cant close ur eyes to the wrongs done in the past, the destruction of temples and forceful conversions . The organizer is not blaming but getting facts known to people like you who are ignorant.
RE:RE:why point destruction
by nadeem ahmed on Feb 17, 2007 01:54 PM Permalink
It so sad that we indiands are ready to cut each other down by one article from a foreigner which was posted abd written with only one intention and it has come true. WHEN WE WILL WAKE UP TO SUCH PRAPOGANDA. wE ARE voicing our opinion without ourself looking and reading history..READ SIR JADUNATH SARKARS HISTORY OF AURANZEB
RE:why point destruction
by anur ram on Feb 17, 2007 01:24 PM Permalink
The babri masjid was built by destroying hindu temple.Can you point out an instance of destroying any other mosque built on a nuetral site.You feel so bad about one mosque being destroyed, How will a hindu feel when tens of thousnads of his temples at holy sites where ransacked and destroyed by barbarian muslim rulers and invaders.comment on this
