Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:from khan..the rich man
by tejas gangane on Feb 22, 2007 04:06 PM   Permalink
Mr. Shah Khan NEuther Hindus are stupid or Poor.It was you & your ancestors who were looting & begging around the world.Armies of Islam were the most impoverished & looted everything.DO not forget that Gulf was or Arabia before advent of oil exploration were even devoid of basic needs.Even today look at Sudan,Syria, Libya & Afro-Islamic countries like Somalia Tanzania Ethoipia all are abominally poor as compared to Hindus, & are equally ingonorant of the world, so take a hard look at facts before opening your mouth.Cow urine is a cure to many skin diseases just as people drink urine of camel in Arabian deserts.Dancing to snake tunes is better than dancing half naked infront of some stupid Arab sheikhs.Islam is
I:Ignorance
S:Stupidiyt
L:Lust
A:Arrogance
M:Mass Murder.
We are better as poor Hindus then being ISLAMIC.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by shah khan on Feb 22, 2007 04:17 PM   Permalink
huh huh, nice man. Syria along with Libya are not poor man and they have been important country throughtout history. The whole african continent is poor it has nothing to do with islam. Think about all the indian hindus working in the gulf region as servents to the arabs, all the money hindus send back to their families. imagine if the hindus were sent back. huh huh??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Secular Indian on Feb 22, 2007 04:32 PM   Permalink
Where do you get your facts from, corner Madarassa ?

"
India has a rich tradition of handicrafts, dating back to the Harappan period. Indian skills in metallurgy, pottery, bead making, inlay work, seal making, stone sculpture, fine jewellery and delicate carving on semi-precious stones, weaving fine cotton clothes drew a wry comment from Pliny, the Roman Chronicler of the 1st Century AD, that Indian handicraft was depleting the Roman treasury to the extent of 50 million sestertius every year.

Economic Historian Angus Maddison in his book The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, noted that India was the world's largest economy between 1st and 15th Century AD, with a 32.9 per centshare of world GDP in the 1st Century to 24.5 per centin 1500 AD. It was down to a pitiable 3.8 per cent in 1952. The declining Indian trade is attributed to British government's domestic trade policy to replace Indian cottage industry creations with factory products. The British increased their share in global trade by marketing Indian handicraft, agriculture and handloom products in western and European markets. They deliberately did nothing to protect the Indian domestic industries. The rich Indian handicraft traditions received a body blow.
"


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Perv Sharma on Mar 01, 2007 07:48 AM   Permalink
Your Arabs

Mate, it's american money over there. American technology. It's the oil discovered by Europeans and not your Arabs and regarding your point of money well The Hindus are working to get that money and not like your greedy arab ancestors who came as looters. Man atleast learn to give credit to hard workers in modern age. But, yeah your madrasa still teaching you about greed and loot. You can't see how generous the Hindus were when they gave land for Paki and some pocket money. Hindus still refrain from calling you as beggars because generosity is in only their religion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:from khan..the rich man
by Sam on Feb 23, 2007 12:14 AM   Permalink
To: Shah Kahn:

Autralia? you don't sound as if you have been living there for a long time. You sound more like from a country that lies NW of India. :-)

Cheers!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by shah khan on Feb 23, 2007 06:31 AM   Permalink
Really man, thanks man. You know so much about Islamic history.

I lived in NZ and in Australia man, come to my home i can get some work for you:servent. u can feed you entire family.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:from khan..the rich man
by Secular Indian on Feb 22, 2007 01:16 PM   Permalink
They keeps replyings because it contradicts theirs Madarassa education and theirs littles brains can't handles mores than one fact at a time. Aurangzeb a tyrant,can't be, impossible, he was only doing his duty, the Maulvi said so. You mean to tell me he was wrong. Perhaps everything the Maulvi taught was a lie. Thats when the brain goes "Cannot computes, cannot computes, cannot computes ... ".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by mohammed salam on Feb 22, 2007 01:19 PM   Permalink
Secular Indian,
I can agree with you to some extent. But, knowing the fact, which khan has pointed, what do you say ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Secular Indian on Feb 22, 2007 01:26 PM   Permalink
Which fact ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by mohammed salam on Feb 22, 2007 01:34 PM   Permalink
plz. dont take my words wrong. quote what khan has pointed. i have seen with my own eyes, indian village womens drinking cows urine etc.. do you justify this in 21st Generation. Will u be happy belive in One omnipresent god or cow, which more than 90% of the world consumes...? you turn.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Secular Indian on Feb 22, 2007 01:45 PM   Permalink
What's wrong with that, if people drink urine that's their problem. I can justify it in the nth Generation. I and the villagers can believe in what we/they like. It is irrelevant to the topic for one and secondly are you by extension implying that, Aurangzeb saw this practice and decided "I've got to put these people out of their misery, I need to save them". What you've just demonstrated is the greatest flaw in your argument and Islam, ie. Our way or no way. Where no way depending upon how powerful the Islamic hold is, is normally death.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Secular Indian on Feb 22, 2007 01:54 PM   Permalink
For the single god argument, I would like to remind you that you have a very superficial understanding of Hinduism. Hinduism has many philosophical schools of thought ranging from Atheism to polytheism. Yes! You read correctly. It is a superset of Islamic thinking which is very basic and rather primitive. The whole idea of a Mr. God that has given an exclusive franchise to some dude in a remote and god forsaken part of the planet and that to in a secret cave, not in public where it can be verified but a cave, is laughable at best. Frankly drinking cow urine pales in comparison, not that it's my favorite beverage.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by Perv Sharma on Mar 01, 2007 07:25 AM   Permalink
Mate I have lived for thirty years in Village. I haven't heard in my village or in any neighbouring villages such a thing. In your village well then these people can follow what they think is right. Please don't tell what one person did. Give a quote from any Hindu religious book asking to drink urine of any animal because You muslims run to Quran for everything so please give a quote from any hindu religious book regarding this matter. I think islam doesn't permit to drink liquor ( a holy book) but so many drink.

Regarding animals are worshipped. U get it wrong. They are respected (sacred) because they are known to have helped the gods in one way or the other. Read Hindu Books to quote allright.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:from khan..the rich man
by ss gpal on Mar 01, 2007 03:08 PM   Permalink
sir the paedmo advised people to drink camel;s urine.Please do look up sunna and hadiths at least ones.By the way type urine therapy and google search you will be amazed! Before the paedmo thought of urine treatment there were hundreds of write ups! if cow's urine drinking is bad, how coe camel's urine is excellent?

Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb