RE:A Brief History of the cult
by shaikh yahya ismail on Feb 17, 2007 01:38 PM Permalink
I have a question for the organiser of this exhibition. Why is the organiser pointing out the destruction of temples of the then times? If so, why not showing off the faces of millions of hindu who destructed the BABRI Masjid openly. Why not organise something to show who exactly did it? It was done so openly and even supreme court is not able to take the decision. Why the heck is the organiser blaming aurangzeb for destruction of temples of that time. Who know who did it that time, but today we all know who destructed the babri masjid. Why arent they accusing those people then? I need the answer of it. No offenses pls.
RE:A Brief History of the cult
by Mohammed Zubair on Feb 17, 2007 01:49 PM Permalink
It seems to me that Mr. Narayan has read some article and is not fully equiped with the background. As a matter of fact if you read anything with pre-concieved mind the outcome will be the likes of what Mr Narayan has written about. I really feel sorry for such minds. I pray for enlightment of his mind. Accumulating books and reading books are one thing and understanding it is another.
I have read many books for instance Bhagwat Geeta, Ramayan, Veda etc... although apparently when I read those books I found many flaws in it however I feel I am accessing the same in today's contexts which may not be true/correct. I shall never beat the drums like you.
RE:RE:A Brief History of the cult
by manvendra saxena on Feb 17, 2007 01:55 PM Permalink
wats the basis of all Geeta, Ramayan, and Vedas Mr Mohammed Zubair. tat will tell us all how much you know
