Even if we assume that the author is biased, let us examine history. The original inhabitants of India were tribals and the Dravidians of the Indus Valley civilisation. The Aryans (including my ancestors) entered invaded India and destroyed the civilisations existing at that time instead of peacefully co-existing with them. This included destruction of the religion of the original Indians. These Aryans were punished for their intolerance by God using instruments like Aurangazeb and other rulers, by having their own temples destroyed. If Aurangazeb was wrong, our Aryan ancestors were also wrong. Is this not natural justice? P.B.Mohan
RE:Is it natural justice?
by vinod bhakuni on Feb 17, 2007 12:32 PM Permalink
Great mohan. Unfortunately we most of Indians enjoy digging others. No one want to see their own history.Sohail
RE:Is it natural justice?
by Saurav Basu on Feb 17, 2007 12:30 PM Permalink
One can only pity your dreadful ignorance.....The AIT is a dead theory......And neither were the inhabitants of the IVS dravidians....
Genetic evidence has conclusively proved that no large scale migration of central asians took place into India....South Asia constitutes a distinct singular race; yeah the tamil and the punjabi Hindu are of one race [except in N.E where there has been a tibetan influx] Sahoo S et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2006, Volume 103, pp 843-848. "...The Y-chromosomal data consistently suggest a largely South Asian origin for Indian caste communities and therefore argue against any major influx, from regions north and west of India, of people associated either with the development of agriculture or the spread of the Indo-Aryan language family... It is not necessary...to look beyond South Asia for the origins of the paternal heritage of the majority of Indians at the time of the onset of settled agriculture. The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through the northwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny..."
Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, the eminent archaeologist found no evidence whatsoever to uphold the AIT...[www.harappa.com] B B Lal, india's foremost archaeologist debunks the myth of the AIT http://www.geocities.com/ifihhome/articles/bbl002.html
And yet you choose to pour your ignorance in this thread......
