Read comments from any islam follower and they will turn a blind eye. Akbar wasn't a great king because he patronised Hindus. But, then that is exactly the reason for stability and some support from rajputs.
Aurangzeb lived a simple,islamic life. He was the greatest mughal emperor. That's all the mullah's teach in MAdrasa nothing about why Akbar succeeded from scratch and Aurangzeb already had a well established empire to look after. the students of these mullahs can't even analyse before and after and they come out teaching.
The mughal empire was no longer a mughal empire at his death. On his death bed he was a defeated man/king. He was the worst emperor in implementation for future but for an average muslim he was the greatest in those days because of the benefits they got whereas the way Hindus were treated.
RE:Islamizton or is it all Mullahisation
by Perv Sharma on Mar 07, 2007 05:00 AM Permalink
You are right Aurangzeb was on teh path of truth of Islam religion i.e just kill the original Hindus of the land. For a looter the truth is to kill and loot and by agreeing that aurganzeb was on the path of truth you have said that islam is a religion of loot and kill.
