Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Great Emperor Aurangzeb
by Mike Gandhi on Mar 06, 2007 12:00 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Aurangzeb ascended the throne on July 21, 1658 and ruled supreme till 1707. Thus Aurangzeb ruled for 50 years, matching Akbar's reign in longevity. But unfortunately he kept his five sons away from the royal court with the result that none of them was trained in the art of government. This proved to be very damaging for the Mughals later on. Aurangzeb had three brothers. His father Shah Jehan favored Dara Shikoh to be his successor. Dara Shikoh was eclectic in his beliefs; therefore Aurangzeb challenged his father's rule. Shah Jahan fell seriously ill and all his sons proclaimed succession. Contrary to everyone's expectations, Shah Jehan recovered. On his recovery, he again backed Dara as his successor. A war of succession broke out among all the brothers. In the long run Aurangzeb was victorious. But as Shah Jehan was in absolute favor of Dara, Aurangzeb no longer trusted him, and had Shah Jehan placed under polite restraint in his own palace. Aurangzeb, a staunch Muslim, gave many grants for the restoration of Hindu temples during his reign. He also appointed Hindus to leading and commanding positions in his government. His chief architectural achievement is the Badshahi Mosque at Lahore, the largest mosque in the world at the time it was built. In his 50 year, Aurangzeb tried to fulfill his great ambition of bringing the entire Sub-continent under one rule. It was under his rule that in 1687 Bijapur and Golkonda, the last of the two Shia states surrendered to the Mughal Empire. The Marhattas continued to fight against Aurangzeb for some time. The last 26 years of Aurangzeb were devoted to his relentless Deccan campaign for the purpose of which he had moved his court to Deccan. Under Aurangzeb's rule, the borders of the Mughal Empire spread out farther than ever before. But due to lack of communication and poor infrastructure it was difficult to hold the empire together. If the court was in the north, there was rebellion in the south, and vice versa. Though he ruled longer than any of his predecessors, yet he could not stop the decline of the Mughal Empire, which hastened after his demise as none of his sons was trained to rule.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:Great Emperor Aurangzeb
by bharatiya on Mar 07, 2007 02:55 PM   Permalink
Mr. Gandhi..



I don't know what you mean. Why don't you just accept that he just screwed up the empire. You are taking of rebellions whenever Aurangzeb moved base but the Marathas faught with him till 1707 even when Shivaji had passed away. Sometimes even without a towering leader. This vindicates the fact that Aurangzeb had caused tremendous hurt to Hindus, Sikhs & all other Indians with his deep rooted bigotry.



In plain simple English, he did the Mughals in. He was the man the Hindus were praying to God for. %u201CUsne Mughlon ke Paap ka ghada itna bhar diya ki akhir wo ghada foot gaya%u201D



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Great Emperor Aurangzeb
by Perv Sharma on Mar 08, 2007 08:57 AM   Permalink
Mike



Didn't they teach u in madrasa about shivaji's son. how he was put to death for not converting to islam. In the north he faced less stiff resistance only because the rajputs had aligned with Akbar and as a result they were the first to be put away by Aurangzeb easily. The Marathas, Sikh Gurus gave him the run. He was running round and round - must have felt he was running in mecca.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
The truth about Aurangzeb