What you observe or say about something largely depends on the perspective from which you are looking. For example, take the case of Ashoka. He was a ruthless ruler and he eliminated everybody who came in his path. Even today, he is despised in parts of Orissa, but in general he is regarded as an efficient ruler by others. If one looks closely at the rule of Aurangzeb, he was very efficient in governance and corruption was almost non-existent during his rule. It's true that he was intolerant when it comes to religion, but at the same time he extended total protection to the lives and property of people who paid taxes (zakaath for muslims and jizyah for non-muslims). As some readers have pointed out, we should look at the positive side of a person as well.
RE:Different Perspectives
by Cyber hinwa on Feb 16, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
Hi ,
Nice to know you think differently . I came across a book and it pained me and set me thinking about the crimes committed by MULSIM INVADERS against my beautiful country INDIA and peace loving people . I have taken trouble to convert the book in pdf file . You may download the book if you follow the download links as given below :
I particularly recommend the reading of chapter XII SEXUAL SLAVERY , and then tell me Do you still think ISLAM is innocent ........ Comments and responses awaited ,
RE:Different Perspectives
by Samir Ankalikar on Feb 16, 2007 04:42 PM Permalink
dear santa, corruption was at its peak when aurangzebs empire extended from kabul to madurai and when he was fighting against the marathas. every one in the country the rajputs , sikhs, jats were angry with hime. it is said that there were 400 rebellions in 10-12 years of his deccan campaign. u will understand what is muslim rule when u take birth in some pakistan or saudi arabia
