Muslims kill poultry and other Animals using a method called Halal. 1.The throat of the animal is slit by a sharp knife. 2.As blood oozes out of the slit throat , the animal suffers in pain. 3. The animal does not die instantly but survives for some time with the full idea that it is going to die.
Muslims defend the practice saying that , because the blood is purged out , the meat is safe , healthy and tasty for humans to eat. it may be true.
but they forget the important point. this is not about how the meat tastes, this is about how cruelly the animal dies.
If the animal was able to speak for itself ,would it not request a fast/instantaneous death ?
If Allah gives Muslims two options 1. Death by Halal i,e by slitting the throat. 2. Death by one single blow i.e instant death what option would muslims choose for themselves?
The same option they should give to animals ,because animals cannot speak for themselves, so we have to use some common sense.
JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A CRUEL 7TH CENTURY ARAB TRIBAL PRACTICE. ( that too copied from Jewish practice of 'Kosher' )
