Your so-called daughter-of-MH has been married and happily settled down in her in-laws(Karnataka). Hope that, atleast for the sake of your daughter(Belgaum), u dont bring up this 'divorce' issue again. And dont spoil her children's (belgaum people) happiness with such politically-deserving remarks !
RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by santosh on Feb 09, 2007 11:56 PM Permalink
The Daughter-in-law should say whether she is living happily or not and not the so called "mother in law". Why not KA graciously call for a referundum to find out that. Let the issue be buried once and for all. Thanks.
RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by Rationalist on Feb 10, 2007 12:20 AM Permalink
Like that half of MH is stolen from KA.
RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by ShivSena on Feb 10, 2007 12:24 AM Permalink
where is proof in that. No part of MH has a Kannada majority. Belgaum has a Marathi majority. Even when Belgaum was given to Karnataka, there was pleading from the locals to go to Maharashtra. No place in Maharashtra asked to go with Karnataka
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by Rationalist on Feb 10, 2007 12:37 AM Permalink
For eg Sholapur, Akalkot.By the way how old is Maharastra? KA is almost 2000 yrs old.In history that Kannada was known as the country between Godavari & Kaveri.But all that is lost due to intrusions from North it is reduced to only so much.There r lot of places in MH of which u wont b Knowing meanings of the names.(Borivilli -Borvalli, Lonavalla etc).Thats bcos derived from Kannada names.Those were the places where major dynasties of Kannada Kings existed.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by Rationalist on Feb 10, 2007 11:09 AM Permalink
Before re union of states in Bombay Karnataka Kannadigas were made to learn Marathi. They used their power tried to Marathise whole region & result KA had 2 loose lot of its territories. If the British rule had contd for another 25 yrs lot of places could have been merged into MH.Nice way of claiming places.
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by Rationalist on Feb 10, 2007 01:17 AM Permalink
Most of places which reunited into were into KA from Bombay region were imposed with Marathi influence due to which there places and like Sholapur, Akalkot etc were lost as people there could speak both languages and they where Kannadigas were majority. For that reason KA had to shed them & accept whatever the report commision gave.Same with Kasargod in Kerela. Central govt to please kerela & TN sanatched Kasargod & joined it into Kerela.I can just give u long list of such places. Who r the losers?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by ShivSena on Feb 10, 2007 12:47 AM Permalink
if we have to go by that logic then the whole of south india should belong to Tamils. Even bangalore was run by chola king at one point. The point is that Marathi people made the majority at the time of independence and make the majority now. It will still be part of a contiguous MH and Kar completely ignored the development of Belgaum due to the marathi population
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by ShivSena on Feb 10, 2007 12:52 AM Permalink
If Karnataka is between Godavari and Kaveri, r u going to give whatever is south of kaveri back to kerala
RE:RE:RE:your child(belgaum) is married and in karnataka(in-laws)
by NARAYAN DIXIT on Feb 13, 2007 11:43 AM Permalink
if we have the habit of stealing like u we wud have stolen your bomb bey long back. dont urgue in case of bgm. tell ur marathas in bgm to co-operate us
