everybody here is trying to compare mr.dutt with all the other criminals who are in/out of jails. but why they dont understand one simple reason of letting him out on bail is that he never missed the dates of trial or never tried to flee the country like many other artiste including mr.nadeem who is languishing in a foreign country. we need to go by the genuinty of a person and not just by the reason that he is a popular person and using his money power.if he was really so powerful then he wouldnt have spent all those 13 months in jail at all and would have been out in 13 minutes or 13 days.
RE:sanjay dutt - bail or no bail
by smv mumbai on Feb 07, 2007 02:30 PM Permalink
Your point seems like he has done a great service to the country by being in jail for 13 months and appearing in court regularly. This is nonsense.
He was sure he would use his MP fathers' full pressure on the state and central Congree governments to give him the best treatment despite his criminal acts during the days before 1993 bombings. He is reported to have personally supervised the quantity of explosives that would be enough or NOT to bring Mumbai on its knees. that is not an ORDINARY crime. Nadeem is hiding in London after murdering Swargeeya Gulshan Kumar as his father is NOT A CONGRESS MP.
RE:RE:sanjay dutt - bail or no bail
by G Sunil on Feb 08, 2007 12:12 AM Permalink
Great Surmises, Just remember this Golden rule: 100 Criminals can go unharmed but not a single innocent should be punished.
