First, the article: several questionable statements and incinerating words definitely not in the interests of the unity of the nation. Second, the messages: my self-confession:first time I read all of them. Only sensible one is that of Ms Reddy. Some others started alright but bogged down soon in mutual blaming degenerating to personal abuse. Sorry status of intelectuals. Finally: the court (tribunal) which is set up with mutual consent, has given its verdict. To fight on it, are we Indian politicians? or Indian industrialists? or terrorists in India?
RE:RE:The article and the the messages
by Venugopal Minnal on Feb 07, 2007 12:52 PM Permalink
I am certain that I do not want to get into contraversy but, pray, if Karnataka did not agree, how does the tribunal came into being? If it is at the instance of Supreme Court directive, accepting it then and questioning its verdict now (I hope you are a reasonable and law abiding person)-don't you consider aginst the grain of honour and integrity?