land=water
by ganesh kumar on Feb 05, 2007 03:05 PM Permalink | Hide replies

Based on the availability of irrigational land in both the states, the verdict has been given. TN got more %, since the water has to cover more areas.

Forward | Report abuse

RE:land=water
by Manjunath ML on Feb 05, 2007 03:09 PM Permalink
If they have more irrigational land, let them have a capacity of store the water and not let the water go to sea.

Forward | Report abuse

RE:RE:land=water
by thanigai kesavan on Feb 05, 2007 03:24 PM Permalink
It is not the matter of the using the ground water or sea water, you must adhere with the intial agreement, you had been denying to share now you are facing the face of the truth.
Thanigai.K.

Forward | Report abuse

RE:land=water
by Rajendra Kulkarni on Feb 05, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
dont measure entire tamilnadu for calculating land.. if you say that way the drinking water to bangalore itself is not available... why should karnataka consider your farmers land...

Forward | Report abuse

RE:land=water
by raja chidambaram on Feb 05, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
You are right. Cauveri is not 100 or 200 yrs old. It is more than 2000 yrs old and been used by the people of cauveri basin since the civilasation formed in that area. The verdict includes all the past and present utilities & rights applicable.

Forward | Report abuse