Justify the use of GOLDEN temple for storing weapons - for the criminals hiding in there ? Can the Sikhs justify the killing of Hindus from Buses - can they justify the Hindus killed in villages so that they migrate out of Punjab - this happened prior to 1984 wherein large Hindus migrated to Delhi - ?
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by on Jan 01, 2008 06:36 AM Permalink
Mr Sharma , I can see the hatred in you ( as a Brahmin) against Sikhism. there is no dobut that Sikhism totally demolished the Brahminwaad from India ( if u see all major states in North as well as South India are plotically lead by Non- brahmins) and this has not been digested by Brahmins till today . The Punjab problem was also a reflection of a Brahmin lady ( Mrs Gandhi) not accpeting the rise of Akalis ( mainly farmer jat Sikhs) to political power.
The Brahmins never accepted Sikhi , starting from Guru Nanak's days ...the local Brahmins saw the loss of political , economical and social power drifting away from them and Brahimins have made multiple attempts to break the Sikhi , by siding with Moguls , by siding with Britshers , by forming Arya Samaj, and by many many cheap ways. Every time Sikhi and it's pricipals have totally demolished the Brahmin mischieves.
Further before debating about Sikhs and Hindu and their commanlity . one has to clearly define what does he means by "Hindu" . By many major Hindus , word Hindu represents geographic identity - people living near Sindhu river were refrred as Hindu's by Greeks. By this definition Sikhs are closest to Sindhu river are thus most Hindus from other religions in india. Further there is no dobut Sikhi has it's genesis in reforming Hindu religion from castism and saving hindus from Islamic jehadis ( Guru's never said that all Muslims are bad) . ...more to continue
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Seenu Subbu on Jan 01, 2008 09:25 AM Permalink
Abe cho..t.iya, what are you yakking? Brahmins sided with the Moghuls? Congratulations on your new historical research. It's still not 12PM, we will wait for that to announce to the world.
RE:RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Hardeep on Jan 01, 2008 12:51 PM Permalink
Brahmin sided with Moguls ....please read History how Brahmin Gangu sided with Jhangir to get Guru Arjun Dev excecuted. Unfortunatly in india we are only taught Mogual histtory .....Sikh , Maratha , South Indian Kings, Bengali Kings .....none of those history is taught. Thanks to Nehru ( a Brahmin). Further the language so called Hindi ...is also Urdu ( the dialect) written in Devnagri Script . Think when moguls , when they can replace Hindu temples ( Ram Janam Bhumi) ....wont they have changed hindu language . As per India Gazaatte 1860( of Rawalpindi) ...Urdu was declared offficial language . So all we speak asuming Hindi ( in dialect) is basically Urdu .....only when written in Devnagri script , it becomes Hindi. So we all are 1/2 Islamized. .... more later
RE:RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Kah S on Jan 01, 2008 09:42 AM Permalink
Subbu ..... Did you forget our Sikh forefathers have been saving your grand grand mothers from those bucther moghuls who use to sell them in the Gazani market for a Takka.That was the great job our forefather use to do at 12 PM.... saving the honour of your grand mothers. History has it that thrice sikh militants(as per moghuls) of those time saved 18 thousand , then 20 thousand and then again 18 thousand hindustani women from invaders like Abdali, Nadir shah and others. Thanks sikhs for 12 PM , else even you would have been borned in Afghanistan or Iran.
Jinki Bachai muhghalo se mata , bahan aur Janani Wahi aaj mazak udaye Sikho ka...besharam Hindustani
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by on Jan 01, 2008 06:50 AM Permalink
Mr Sharma , I can see the hatred in you ( as a Brahmin) against Sikhism. there is no dobut that Sikhism totally demolished the Brahminwaad from India ( if u see all major states in North as well as South India are plotically lead by Non- brahmins) and this has not been digested by Brahmins till today . The Punjab problem was also a reflection of a Brahmin lady ( Mrs Gandhi) not accpeting the rise of Akalis ( mainly farmer jat Sikhs) to political power.
The Brahmins never accepted Sikhi , starting from Guru Nanak's days ...the local Brahmins saw the loss of political , economical and social power drifting away from them and Brahimins have made multiple attempts to break the Sikhi , by siding with Moguls , by siding with Britshers , by forming Arya Samaj, and by many many cheap ways. Every time Sikhi and it's pricipals have totally demolished the Brahmin mischieves.
Further before debating about Sikhs and Hindu and their commanlity . one has to clearly define what does he means by "Hindu" . By many major Hindus , word Hindu represents geographic identity - people living near Sindhu river were refrred as Hindu's by Greeks. By this definition Sikhs are closest to Sindhu river are thus most Hindus from other religions in india. Further there is no dobut Sikhi has it's genesis in reforming Hindu religion from castism and saving hindus from Islamic jehadis ( Guru's never said that all Muslims are bad) .
Sikhi Spirit calls for to defend anyone who is downtorodden and weak
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Perv Sharma on Jan 01, 2008 01:38 AM Permalink
Can the Sikhs justify the issuance of FATWAS similar to ISLAMISTS like - the women should cover their head and much or they will be killed ?
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Goldy on Jan 01, 2008 05:18 AM Permalink
Only less than 1% sikhs are in favour of Khalistan. That was one reason the militancy in Punjab came to an end because Khliastan Movement never had support from majority of sikh. Even today. Sikhs dont issue Fatwas. It was unfortunate at the time of militancy and it was issued by those terrorist outfits which were supported by Pakistan.
RE:Can a SIKH ?
by Perv Sharma on Jan 01, 2008 01:44 AM Permalink
Take a CASE - some Hindus come out of Temples fire randomly at people and then run back to the temple - what will the sikhs do in such a CASE in their KHALISTAN ?
