Everyone should ask themselves the following questions: 1.How many terror attacks took place in the US after 911? 2.How many terror attacks took place in Russia after Putin came to power? 3.How many terror attacks took place in Great Britian after they started cracking down on terrorists and jehadists after July 7th? 4.How many terror attacks have taken place in China whose western provices have significant muslim population? 5.Finally,how many terror attacks have taken place in INDIA under the able leadership of PM MANMOHAN SINGH AND SONIA GANDHI?See where I am going with this??
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by pragr on Dec 31, 2007 09:14 AM Permalink
well its interesting to note that most of the terrorist attacks in India were in the states not ruled by Congress. And also who can forget the biggest blot in the Indian history - Lahore Bus Yatra and subsequent Kargil war. Needless to mention who was at the centre at that time. The above statistics have been mentioned totally out of context. How many Muslims reside in each of these countries? There are 15 crore Muslims in India. By this count, India is highly susceptible to terrorist attacks. (I dont mean to malign a religion but just presenting a line of reason). Terrorism is a reality in the modern world which cannot be done away with. India needs a stable govt to sustain its economic momentum. Only then we can be a country of dominance the way China is now. At present our govt is more or less stable albeit the continuous bickering by the left. I wish BJP or Congress, whoever wins the next GE gets a clear majority so that they stay away from the menace of coalition politics.
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by kshitij tumbde on Dec 31, 2007 09:18 AM Permalink
If it were not for coalition politics, some fanatic decisions would have been taken by people who get absolute majority. Manmohan is a sardar and Advani is too much to the right to be given absolute power. Coalition keeps things under check and provides stability. Both NDA and UPA completed their terms.
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by cupid on Dec 31, 2007 08:36 AM Permalink
@nationalist
India supports the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world ....Nothing can be done here...making it worse the congress bootlicks minority at the cost of national securiity ....
the first thing that should be promulgated is "common civil code " ...
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by Ismail Sayyed on Dec 31, 2007 09:03 AM Permalink
It is these same appeasement theory which has relegated Muslims to the most backward sections of the scociety.It is this same muslims who were the ruling class when British left India and in just about 50 years using hate as a weapon they are just like dalits whom u used to enslave using religions edicts.
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by kshitij tumbde on Dec 31, 2007 09:09 AM Permalink
Your forefathers fault. They should have followed Jinnah across the border and some suicide bomber would have killed 3-4 in your family.
After 10th century rule of Prithviraj Chauhan, Jawaharlal Nehru was the first HINDU ruler of undivided India. If you read about Mahatma Gandhi, he was Hindu to the core of his personality. Hindus have earned rightful place to govern their own country as a majority. Do you see any other religion person ruling any of the countries in the west?
RE:WEAK LEADERSHIP BREEDS TERROR
by Sahadevan KK on Jan 01, 2008 09:14 AM Permalink
A Dalit President could not save Dalits in our country. A Sardar could not save Sardars. A Muslim President could not save Muslims. A Modi will not save Hindus also. 1 lakh farmers suicided in Vajpayee's regime. A secular solution must come at centre.
