Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
congress and pseudo securalism
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 01:44 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Sikhs getting slaughered in thousands = A MISTAKE.
Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem.
Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust.
Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.
Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal.
Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.
Kargil Attack = Government failure.
Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.
Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular
Reservations in Minority institutions = Communal.
Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism.
Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.
Talking about Hindus and Hinduism appeasment = Communal
Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.
BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful
Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one daughter of it
minister in Kashmir [Rubina Sayed] = Natural Political dilemma.
Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude
Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders =
Humanity and Political dilemma.
BJP questioning Islam = Communal.
Congress questioning Lord Rama existance = Clerical Error.
Is there any end to Congress and it shameless supporters hypocrisy



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by Shrujal Vakharia on Dec 27, 2007 01:55 AM   Permalink
Absolutely agreed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:06 AM   Permalink
rightly said.

even musharraf can b better than cong/pseudo-seculars. coz mush
can storm army into a place like lal masjid in pak, (unlike our hazarat bal masjid saga under cong rule).
can kill the terrorist groups in masjid inspite of their leaders' request for making surrender.
can call the madrassas as creating terror outfits.
v can make musharraf as our pm (that way media and pseudo-seculars wud also b happy).

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 02:30 AM   Permalink
your words about congress pseudo securalism is accepted..but we dont need cartoon mental third rate fool like mushraff to do that job.India is not a banana republic to consider about funny creatures to lead the nation.he is better for that scum porkistan..we already got super star modi to work on that.he will bomb the terrorist a** soon .we are not concerned about pseudo secular to be happy..let they die with the mullahs..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:36 AM   Permalink
i agree with u. but my point is even person like mush can do cleansing in pak masjid, but here in ind, there is no one to even think of it. i hope modi like ppl prosper n do the job not merely in guj but in india as a whole.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by Santosh on Dec 27, 2007 01:57 AM   Permalink
Very well said, that time is not too far.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by Satyajeet Mohapatra on Dec 27, 2007 02:06 AM   Permalink
Agreed 100%

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:55 AM   Permalink
taslima nasreena blaming islam= communal.
karuna-andhi abusing Ram= his atheist nature.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:32 AM   Permalink
further add.
mf hussain painting nudity of hindu godddess= freedom of expression
denish cartoon on mohammed and taslima nasreen writings on islam = hurting sentiments of minority.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by vipul saxena on Dec 27, 2007 02:39 AM   Permalink
It was not congress which freed 4 militants. It was V P Singh government which was supported by both Communists and BJP. They freed dreaded militants for daughter of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed. and jaswant singh also escorted militants to Kandahar for Indian Airlines hijacked plane, again it was BJP government.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 03:11 AM   Permalink
no..you are wrong..that is during rajiv gandhi government in the centre freed 4 militants...dont burn with the wrong facts here..by the way what is your answer for the rest dude...let me add this way..bjp freed 3 terrorist for 100 indians..but congress gave half the land of kashmir in afraid of fuc**ng muslim terrorist..why?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by Muslim on Dec 27, 2007 03:43 AM   Permalink
Kashmir is muslim area. That is why Congress gave it to Pakistan. Soon Muslims will divide india into small parts & take over. We are born to rule these Hindus. My blood boils when Hindu leaders give us orders.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by vipul saxena on Dec 27, 2007 04:11 AM   Permalink
no no prabha karan u r wrong again, check history please, it was V P singh government supported by BJP, just google it you will find it. v p singh government released those 4.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Dawood funded Hyderabad blasts'