Dear men I want to ask a question. if Left elected again at W.bengal with high mejority do we say what CPM did at nandigram was right??? In gujarat also the case is same. we cant judge the truth only based on its majority. this is one fault side of democracy.
RE:majority
by dinkar kadam on Dec 25, 2007 10:19 AM Permalink
Everyone , even the insane will disagree with violence particularly with killings of the innocent. But never isolate Post- godhra riots with the burning of the innocent at the Godhra. You have not seen a riot. Just a few begin it and then the the mobs never realize what is happening. It is a madness that decends on hundreds at a time. This country has seen so much against hindus and just once it happens to muslims the reactions are so sharp? . Remember , the past and even the present is in favor of muslms and christians in India. They are more safer , pampered and secure in India than any where else.
The issue is subjudice, the media has gone on an over kill by damaging the Modi led force by its partial and biased reporting. The people have given their verdict 3 times after the riots. They want BJP/Modi. Yes majority need not be right but the minority is certainly not right in case of Gujrat. Lets speak of development people, and Modi has done it. You need not love Modi but you can speak the truth I guess.
RE:majority
by jay shukla on Dec 25, 2007 09:13 AM Permalink
My dear Selah, have u ever gone to gujarat, have seend the roads, have seen the industries, have u seen the land developement and employement in Kutch after the earth quack, if u haven't seen with your own eyes, i request u to just go and watch, and about the nandigram..In UP, Bihar, remote areas of MP, Delhi, Kashmir, punjab, Andra, there are some examples where everyday nandigram occurs at any time, in five years not a single riots have being occured in Gujarat. Now i think u better Understand why people of gujarat have voted, Election Commisssion it self has declared this is the most peacefull and election that have ever happened in India
RE:majority
by selah on Dec 25, 2007 09:41 AM Permalink
dear if people vote for that reason it is good. i hope it should be true but not in communal base.
RE:RE:majority
by Chilukuri Murty on Dec 25, 2007 10:06 AM Permalink
Dear - Why In India communal word is used now and then at every platform. Look at Malaysia, the Islamic Government is demolishing temples now and then but nobody branded them as communal country. The same is the case with other Islamic Countries where Hindus are not allowed to erect temples for worship. One can easily judge who is communal - Islamic countries or Non-Islamic countries ?
RE:majority
by Rajiv Jain on Dec 25, 2007 10:32 AM Permalink
On the similar Can you dare to ask - If Congress is in power at center the 1984 riots and Sikh massacre is National Wide Acceptance ?? Do you know who is Tytler ??
RE:majority
by Kameshwar Chesetti on Dec 25, 2007 09:58 AM Permalink
Hi Selah, Good question. Looks like its not just hindus vs muslims, rather its about land - land seems to thirst for blood. Average indian wants to lead a peaceful life be it hindu or muslim (if he/she is responsible and hard-working). Jobless people or people with too much money might go into fantasy world blaming a community for all the problems.
RE:majority
by dinkar kadam on Dec 25, 2007 10:32 AM Permalink
Never compare the nandigram with Post Godgra. Nandigram was planned, post godhra was spontaneous. Post godra was an out burst out of a frustration built up because of decades of mischievous vote bank politics. Nandigram was only to demonstrate the muscle of the looters of land against those who want to keep their land and lively hood . Post godhra was an effect of systematic abuse and redicule of hindu gods , traditions , ritules and beliefs %u2013 read the setusmudram, ayaodhya, conversions, haj subsidies, kashmiri pandits, terrorism, akshardham, parliament attack , M.F. Hussain, %u2026the list is endless.
RE:majority
by Chilukuri Murty on Dec 25, 2007 09:27 AM Permalink
dear selah - if in your opinion we cannot judge the truth only based on its majority - did you raise the question when Lalu Voted to power 3 times in Bihar though Law & Order was extremely bad at that time. Congress Govt was responsible for killing thousands of sikhs in 1984 but it was elected at the Centre ? What is your answer ?
RE:RE:majority
by selah on Dec 25, 2007 09:42 AM Permalink
still the same (we cannot judge the truth only based on its majority) i didnt meant only about BJP
RE:majority
by jay shukla on Dec 25, 2007 09:49 AM Permalink
yes selah, U r right, but in Gujarat Voting case, nothing had happened since last 5 yrs....so there is no question of communlism
RE:majority
by Sahadevan KK on Dec 25, 2007 12:16 PM Permalink
Demolision of Babri Masjid; Communal violence on Ram Temple at Ayodhya; Gujarat carnage on Muslims 2002; Attack on MF Hussain, Chandramohan like artists; Attack on Parzania, Fana, Water, Tare Jameen Par like pictures; READ: indian2007a.googlepages.com
