That is the reason.Mahabharata is with 9verse.Basically it is a dialogue between Arjuna and Lord Krishnaa. It is a human psychology. You cannot have the mind the complete human psychology because it is independent. You cannot cover the whole human psychology in 660 pages.You cannot .Human psychology is much beyond it.And it is still evolving.That is the reason Sanatana Dharama does not have the end.It is evolving day by day.
RE:RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:28 PM Permalink
>>>>Sami Common Sammi again u come up with Dr. Zakir liar version. Again if u have guts to read please read the following line 1. That Shri Krushna does not possess any material body. I had already given quotes from Gita. ajo api sann avyayatma bhutanam isvaro 'pi san prakrtim svaam adhishthaya sambhavamy atma-maayaya (Bhagavad Gita 4-6) ajah--unborn; api--though; san--being so; avyaya--imperishable; atma--Self or Spirit; bhutanam--all living beings( those who are born); isvarah--the Supreme Lord or controller; api--although; san--being so; prakrtim svaam--My own essential nature(of being without material/subtle body); adhishthaya--being so situated or established; sambhavami--I manifest Myself; atma-maayaya--Power or Wisdom or Consciousness of HimSelf. Although I am Unborn, of imperishable Spirit (as in body, soul and spirit i.e. Krishna says HE has no material/subtle body), though I am Lord of all living beings, established in MY OWN ESSENTIAL NATURE(Purna=complete and perfect Spiritual nature without material/subtle body), I manifest Myself through MY OWN Power. avyaktam vyaktim apannam manyante mam abuddhayah param bhavam ajananto mamavyayam anuttamam(Bhagavad Gita 7:24)
RE:>>balaord
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
Can these "One Book, One God and One King" fellows ever understand such deep theory, Mr. Fantastic ?
RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:17 PM Permalink
Prakash - the Modern science owes its birth to islamof course a empty head like you dont understand these things..
RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:26 PM Permalink
>>> the Modern science owes its birth to >>>islamof course a empty head like you dont >>>understand these things Islam has the history of taking other goodies work in their name. I have given u one of the example that one of your ancestor called Aryabhata who invented the concept of Zero, now one of the arab scholar had successfully taken the credit of Aryabhat's work in his name. Man get up!!Please do extensive research on the Islamic philosophers book, You will find that most of the works are from Greek philosopher like of Aristototle. Common..i donot thing that any body will stop u for research.Please do research for at least Greek's work.You will be able to expose.
RE:RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:33 PM Permalink
It is true ZERO is a concept used in India,before Arabs started using it.but to say Aryahbatta invented Zero is a idiotic argument. Muslims never denied that,Infact acknowldged that as Hind numbers before westerns called it Arabic numbers.. But i dont understand your argument?just because of zero how can you deny what i am saying..? Do you know Mayans and samirians had number systems too?it failed because it was never used as extensivly as Arabs used Hindu nu,mber system
RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:29 PM Permalink
Fantastic -Instead of arguing with me , you should better argue with keith devlin the executive director of standford univeristy and the influential memeber of American mathematical association. education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,786006,00.html This link , is a artile he wrote on Guardian UK newspapaer
RE:RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
It cann't be. One book cannot be the ultimate truth or have comple human psychology. Even you can find yourselves here in rediff, many people have different views. Only islam has abandones the free thaughts for debate.That is the reason the muslims are subjected to become the most gullible creed and has taken the path of disastrous of the whole human kind.
RE:>>balaord
by Sami on Dec 22, 2007 05:27 PM Permalink
you should not use the word cannot when it related to god. God is the one who knows in and out of all
