RE:good act:
by stav on Dec 21, 2007 03:31 PM Permalink
Where did you get this bull from, the indian commies or the chinese articles ? We have never in the last 5,000 history ever shared borders with China. How did we do so suddenly, these guys had no business in Tibet let alone the indian border with Tibet.
RE:good act:
by ss on Dec 21, 2007 03:22 PM Permalink
yes, u r rite. nehru wanted to sacrifice indian lives to show that india is superior to china militarily. n we all know wat happened. gud to c that india accepts china as big brother & is willing to forge a relationship.
RE:good act:
by PKN on Dec 21, 2007 04:12 PM Permalink
China of course is a smarter country than India is . In China they would have put a Slimy Shitball like you before the the firing squad if you ever thought on those lines. Nehru was an idiot and idiots dont plan and idiots cannot plan. He was possibly standing before a full sized mirror and watching himself with a full bloomed rose on his buttonhole and rehearsing for his speech in Colombo when the Chinese troops massacred the ill equipped and poor prepared Indian Army . Nehru was the original 'maut ke saudagar' But only a nitwit who has not cared to ready history would suggest that Indian's most imcompetent PM , Nehru was the one who attacked China. When some one punches you on your nose you should feel the urge to punch him back on his nose. If you feel the urge to accept him as your brother and forge a relationship.... you belong to what is called the third sex.
RE:good act:
by Sonu Madhavan on Dec 21, 2007 04:03 PM Permalink
that the problem with Indian they always want to be younger brother and want someone other to patron them
RE:good act:
by ashok chavda on Dec 21, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
Yes, the real history says so.Forty years later, few know the real story of what happened, what went wrong. Successive governments have refused to release the Henderson-Brooks report that investigated the lapses of 1962.The British imperialists did draw an illegal McMahon Line, but they dared not occupy in reality the territories of China to the south of that line. But the Nehru government did just that. n 1960, the Nehru government not only refused publicly to negotiate with Premier Zhou Enlai who made a special trip to New Delhi to seek a friendly settlement of boundary issue, but rejected any standstill agreement.
In October 1962, Nehru ordered the army to take the offensive and made a statement about it on the 12th of the same month. His statement shocked the whole world. The New York Herald Tribune published an editorial entitled 'Nehru Declares A War Against China' the following day. China had no intention to solve the boundary issue by force, which was proved by the fact that as soon as the PLA won the war, it returned to its original posts.
It was Rajiv Gandhi, who undone what his grant father did. With his personal visit to China. the relations improved.
But how did the Nehru government explain the event to the Indian public? It had no courage to admit its mistakes and tell the truth, but adopted dishonest and irrational means to blame it on China, saying China conducted an "unprovoked aggression" against India, and China "betrayed India".
RE:good act:
by srinivas kumar on Dec 21, 2007 03:24 PM Permalink
you are true, i have read many articles in this regard, we could have prevented it then, actually the ball was was in our court
