When Modi talked Sohrabuddin (that too after being provocated), every "secular" jobless person raised a hue and cry, not deserving the fact that Sohrabuddin was in reality a terrorist, who masqueraded under the umbrella of a Muslim, a fact that most of Gujarat was aware of. Now you have the Congress party misguiding farmers by promising to withdraw cases against those who were booked by Modi's administration for power theft (which is a cognizable offence and if you and I do it, we can be prosecuted and jailed as we cause a loss to the country's finances). Is this not a blatant case of instigating people to break the law of the land? Is this not a case of encouraging robbery? Why is the Election Commission keeping quiet on this criminal attempt to circumvent the law? One can understand the so-called intellectuals, secularists, jobless NGOs, most of the English media and Useless Commies not raising their sword and protesting, but why is Manmohan Singh (being an honest, efficient & able administrator) silent? Is it because the favourite pet of the household silently watches it's masters rob their own home?
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Pop Head on Dec 19, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
Ashok. What you mean Sohrabuddin was masquerading under an umbrella of a Muslim? So what's his real religion - Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist?? Have you any access to any data that even Modi's police do not have?
Why is it you think non-Jehadis (Secularists) in this country are jobless - implying only Jehadi Hindus/Modi chamchas are employable? Most of the secularists targeted in these type of blogs are not only employed very well but represent some of the most accomplished Indians in their chosen fields - people like Narayan Murthy of Infosys.
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Ashok Abraham on Dec 19, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
Sohrabuddin had cases registered against him for goondagiri much before his death and this was also reported in India Today magazine (which I presume is not "saffron"). It was also reported that most security agencies were aware of the threats and criminal activities of that guy. Of course, this did not give anyone the right to bump him off, a fact that Modi also publicly endorsed. That Modi later brought up Sohrabuddin as an election issue should not be seen singularly and narrowly, as Modi's opponents do not fare better.
I am not holding a candle for Narayan Murthy (and am surprised his name is being selectively added to justify the survival of secular jokers), but it must be understood that most "secularists" are paper tigers and can only show their mite against the Hindu community, given the point that most Hindus are extremely tolerant and will not retaliate/throw books/chappals/declare a fatwa against those who write & act derogatively against them. If these "secularists" have spine, let us see them flexing their cardboard muscles against the few fundamentalist Muslims (who bring such a bad name for their community). I bet these guys will not have the guts to do so. One does not need too much intelligence to understand their morality and courage (proof of which is their deafening silence on the Anti-Sikh riots of '84, where thousands of that proud community were looted, raped, chopped and set on fire by Congress goons). You still think these guys have stuff?
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Pop Head on Dec 19, 2007 05:21 PM Permalink
Ashk. You still skirted my question:What you mean Sohrabuddin was masquerading under an umbrella of a Muslim? So what's his real religion - Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist??
You also skirted the question:Why is it you think non-Jehadis (Secularists) in this country are jobless - implying only Jehadi Hindus/Modi chamchas are employable?
Well, Narayan Murthy came out against the Gujurat riots to stand up and be counted as a secularists.
I do not know whether secularists are paper tigers. You are free to think whatever you feel we are. It doesn't really matter. I am Pophead. My head is cracked open and my brains are jutting out. My brain is an empty shell.
I do not want to comment on your personal traits and on the state of your thoughts, I assume you are expressing your views in your own way. Similarly, I repeat that one does not need too much intelligence to understand these "secularists". Selectively using Narayana Murthy for just one of his comments is not convincing to win a discussion. And I do not want to cloud your judgement of Modi/his chamchas etc.
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Krish Koundy on Dec 22, 2007 01:24 AM Permalink
SECULARISM & SOCIALISM are fashion weaer of half baked intellectuals in the cities. These half learned folks think that the fasion wear needs banding from Congress and commies, there fore support them tooth and nail.
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Ashok Abraham on Dec 19, 2007 05:22 PM Permalink
Something more...Sohrabuddin did not have any religion other that criminality. He was a gangster and that is as simple as that. A guy who murdered innocent Muslims in Gujarat is as criminal as a guy who murdered Sikhs in Delhi and is as criminal as a guy who murdered poor villagers (many of whom were Muslims) in Nandigram in Bengal. If one were to go by the number of crimes, then the BJP's hands are bloody but the Congress' entire body is covered in blood (as most communal riots and crimes took place when they were in power). Even Babri Masjid was brought down when Congress was in power (of course, it suited their interests to play the soft-Hindutva card at that time). A snake has venom only in it's fangs, while the Congress party has venom throughout it's body. And poisonous snakes will die if they ever bite many of these "secularists", people who selfishly divide people in order to justify their own survival and existence.
RE:Paradox of the state...
by Pop Head on Dec 19, 2007 05:27 PM Permalink
You say Sohrabuddin did not have any religion other that criminality. Now you perfectly understand why we consider Moditva and Hindutva supporters as Jehadis as terrorism has no religion. They share a common mindset - hatred and violence!
RE:RE:Paradox of the state...
by Pop Head on Dec 19, 2007 05:28 PM Permalink
By the way Ashok you still skirted my question:Why is it you think non-Jehadis (Secularists) in this country are jobless - implying only Jehadi Hindus/Modi chamchas are employable?
I think you cleverly diverted the discussion here. Ashok's main point was about Congress and silence of EC. Isn't Congress instigating farmers to break the law of the land???? Please answer this first and then we will discuss your questions.
