I want to know what Pravin had to say about his brother during the in-camera court sessions. Pramod Mahajan was a public figure and everything about him the public has a right to know, I think. If Pravin killed him because he had a genuine reason to do so, maybe we can sympathise with him without asking for sparing his life. Justice is not 'delivered' until we know his side of the story, so to speak. Pramod Mahajan's assassination was the ultimate criticism of 'what', we would like to know.
RE:Media bias
by ramesh safety ramesh on Dec 17, 2007 02:14 PM Permalink
It is the hatred between the brothers and promod mahajan was not a good man he acted more than brother hood to ambanis to flurish by giving exemptions so nothing wrong in killing him
RE:Media bias
by Narendra Nayak on Dec 17, 2007 01:12 PM Permalink
The guy, Pravin, talks like he is mad. By 'genuine reason' I mean reasons which are true, not lies or imaginary which may be indicative of a guilty consciousness: or a desire to cheat the law by demonstrating a mentally deranged condition of mind and in doing so to escape punishment as deserved. If Pramod was evil what did Pravin had to say about it. I was wondering if RTI can be taken recourse to in order to learn about Pravin's motive for killing his brother. If the court rules that Pramod Mahajan's murder case is out of bounds for the public then we can shut up. Or else I demand to know what Pravin said behind closed doors.
RE:Media bias
by Rahul Saurav on Dec 17, 2007 01:26 PM Permalink
Mr. Nayak, strong arumentation you have depicted. What can you do by knowing all the family matters behind the murder. Can you memorise history of Mugal, Saha and few other dynasty? They killed their brother and even father for the throne but this person (perhaps for money)? I don't believe he will be punished for his sin. It is just to highlight the people of India and then he will be escaped easily by polical power imposition to SC/HC judge. See recent cases. If Promod was evil, then Pravin is not the person to give punishment like death. I don't understand what you want to say by "if Pramod was evil"?
RE:Media bias
by Narendra Nayak on Dec 17, 2007 01:39 PM Permalink
Pravin would not have killed his brother if he had not thought him to be 'evil'. I want to know everything he said about his brother in court. I dont believe there is nobody out there who is interested in knowing the motives behind events that happened in history. Pramod Mahajan is part of contemporary history and I need to know as much I can about him as possible because I am interested in knowing about it. Had Pravin not killed his brother and instead wrote a scandalous book on him, I would have much preferred that. After all Pramodji's stint as I&B minister was not something which deserved an award by parliament.
RE:Media bias
by B Kumar on Dec 17, 2007 04:31 PM Permalink
Dear, Praveen may now utter any nonsense again his deceased brother nowing fully well that, one, his brother is not alive to defend himself and, second, many political opponents of Pramod would lap up his bundle of lies to paint BJP in black. Let no one give any importance to nonsense of Praveen who has a very cold and criminal bend of mind. people like him can never be trusted
RE:Media bias
by Narendra Nayak on Dec 17, 2007 01:22 PM Permalink
Now that the court has ruled that Pravin is guilty we the people might be informed what Pravin had to say about why he killed his brother. Why did it get out in the first place that Pravin started revealing scandalizing things about Pramod when the court ruled that it was to kept from the public? Why was the court trying to shield Pramod? What Pravin said in court however dirty it may be, dont forget, was his motive for gunning down Pramod. Now that the verdict is out we need to know about it.
