Sanatan dharam was great 3-4 thousand years back. India had fertile land, there was enough to eat and be satisfied. Hindus were perfecting the art of meditation, music, numbers and sex. Fast forward to 800 AD. By this time , world was mobile and was investing in arms and learning psychological ways to dominate. Arabs who were nearest to us, heard about the riches of India and came charging in. Hindus were neither ready physically nor mentally to offer any resistance. They had never seen such barbaric warfare. When you are rich and weak, invaders come. Britishers too came for the same reason.
Britisher left because, India was 'kangal' by 1947. There was nothing more to extract. Khalas. They made Gandhi a hero by propping him up( you don't want to be killed while fleeing so migh as well give the power to a peacenik, anothe eg. Mandela) and we still don't question that. Passivity of Sanatan dharam is in our genes. Sikh Gurus finally broke off with Hindus because they were not ready to put up with this BS. Hindus merrily continue their way. So far numbers are with us but for how long? This world will be ruled by race which has high political IQ. Islam is on upswing. They have successfully exploited wars between two sects of Christianity- Catholic/Protetants vs Orthodox Chrisitnas and also used oil to gain access to several institutions in the West. If they play their card well, 21st century would belong to Islam. Sorry Hindus, Christians, and Sikh friends.
RE:Indians have low political IQ
by Perv Sharma on Dec 18, 2007 07:47 AM Permalink
I think your knowledge of History is only limited to INDIA - the Islamic forces used all the barbaric methods to expand - EAST OR WEST . But, in the west they went upto spain wherein they ended up facing an equally BARBARIC CHRISTIAN CRUSADERS - IN FACT IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT ITS THE MOST HORRIBLE CRIMES COMMITTED BY THESE CRUSADERS - but the result - END OF ISLAMIC SPREAD TOWARDS WEST - it meant the end of Islam and the rise of West - especially the English rather than Christainity and the ENGLISH RULED THE WORLD AND THEY DO TILL TODAY - EVERY ISLAMIC COUNTRY EVEN TODAY IS A SLAVE OF THE ENGLISH BUT NOT INDIA OR THE HINDUS ?
RE:Indians have low political IQ
by Ramesh Aryan on Dec 18, 2007 07:32 AM Permalink
I will give Muslims all over the world another ten thousand years,try with all your strength.no body has the guts to rule the world.ok if possible the santhana Dharmis can rule this world by love and affection through yoga,way of life teachings which the world religions, so called strongest Islam and christians are living the life of wild creatures.sorry to say this but i cant help my dear earthmate.tHink about it till you go mad.jai hind!
RE:Indians have low political IQ
by Anurag Shrivastava on Dec 18, 2007 09:01 AM Permalink
Oil is getting over. Only countries with brain power will prosper - and the only players in this game are the west , russians, chinese and indians. sorry sameer - there is no place for the brainless and ill educated.
RE:RE:Indians have low political IQ
by abc on Dec 18, 2007 08:27 AM Permalink
The biggest battle on the earth was Mahabharata. Bhim tore off the chest of Dushashana with his bare hands and drank his blood. So, we did see our part of barbaric acts. Also, we hear about all these astra-shastra that were used in Ramayana and Mahabharata. I think Hindus perfected the art of warfare too.
What dragged the Hindu society down was the stupid Caste system. We officially declared that only 25% of the population (kshatriya) was fit as warriors. That too me is total BS. To say that because one was born in a Kshatriya family he had the aptitude and attitude necessary to fight or to lead an army is a joke. I think the urge to fight, to invade and to capture is independent of caste. I don't know why our 'perfect' ancestors didn't get it.
RE:Indians have low political IQ
by r patil on Dec 18, 2007 08:54 AM Permalink
To abc caste system did not drag us back.There are many caste which attacked as warriors during the time of need.Specially the farmers.rajut caste and maratha caste ,peshwas,bhumihar brahmins,are the testamony of inter caste job minglings.The reason why hindus lost after 700(We were attacked for 700yrs,the great sinds and afganis sustained resistance from 7000 till it fell to islamic invaders) yrs of continues attack where as the great Persian lost to the islamic invaders within 100yrs after islam was born.Even after India was attacked ,India continued to become a hindu majority inspite of the barbaric murders,only because we were morally,physically strong and very populus country.Read Sita Ram goels In defence of Hindu Society.He has noted from hindu and muslim manuscript that we lost mainly because we failed to understand the "enemies mind",and they take proper advantage of the hindutaboos.Like hindus did not attacked enemies villages and they did not slaugter the non-combatants male and enslaved their females and children.We did not attack in night,did not attack unarmed solidier,did not atack war animals,did not attack laces of worship and so on.These all things were used by muslims to invade successfuly.
