"Yet has any Indian historian enquired who this guy Archbold was? How did a Cambridge don writing about French poetry become the Principal at this college? Who suggested his name? Why did his predecessor resign? Is there a biography? No, sir, not one. The man has become a mere footnote even though there are a million questions to be answered about him."
Should they be researching this? Sure, but their job depend on not researching such topics. Why bother? Truth can be harmful to ego, health and pockets. God forbid they are wrong.
