The observation from Raghavan is absurd in the present day context as he is talking about moral absolutes and contextual morals. The fact remains that their is no morality in the functioning of our country. People are questioning the very existance of our religious and moral beliefs cannot be contextual morality.[Sonia, CPM and DMK questioning the very existance of Lord Rama]. It can only be termed as contextual as this statement of theirs would amass non-hindu votes. Questioning the encounter of Sohrabuddin is contextual because we are seeing and reading what progress is happening in the Abu Salem and Telgi's cases.Every kid on the road now knows who they are [which can be argued by saying that the image is created by people] what their crimes are etc.We can see how our legal system is crawling and making a good reporting medium for filthy news channels like AAj Tak and the likes of it. So knowing what sohrabuddin was and knowing what his acts were,an encounter was a befitting judgement-This can be termed as contextual Morality.Upholding Afzal Guru's hanging can be termed as contextual only but not moral. In Gita its mentioned that contextual morality is achieved when the act or acts termed contextually moral are correct when it benefits a larger section.So does Chankya Neeti. So westerners moral absolute,if any,is a dumb way of doing things,because in a dynamic environment you need situation based morality. Lakeer Ke Fakheer-Moral Absolutism.
