Why should Sania and her party choose a place of worship for commercial adds? Is she idiot or something to not know that religion does not mix well with such commercial-cum-sensual activities
People supporting her are only morbid minds joined in blind hatred against Islam
RE:I DEFEND CLERICS
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 13, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
What a waste of time of the courts, The venue was chosen by the advert makers not Sania, beside doesn't India have an advertising standards agency to whom this could be reported and the advert banned to be aired saving valuable court time.The cost of making avert and the fine imposed on the advert maker is enough to send the message out that the place of worship regardless of which religion is not open to exploitation. Just as in west all misleading adverts or material that is degrading and that sends out wrong message to masses is reported by the public to ASA whose decision is final and an apology and the out come is aired on the national TV channels.
RE:I DEFEND CLERICS
by kamal sharma on Dec 13, 2007 06:49 PM Permalink
she has limited source of funds & her expenditures r obviously & rightly high. SHE 7 CO. HAS TO CREATE SUCH CONTROVERSIES TO OBTAIN MEDIA SPACE
RE:I DEFEND CLERICS
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 06:47 PM Permalink
Arms are very dear to muzzies god as he was criminal kind of person..Now the solution is demolish the mosque as sania shoot a ad film over there. :)
