Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Is It True??
by Contractor on Dec 13, 2007 03:48 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

When vajpayee was in power he wore a kullah and attended iftar party. I was surprised to see that photo in the newspaper. When cong. people attended they were called muslim-appeasers.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Vinod Sharma on Dec 13, 2007 04:07 PM   Permalink
Is it concern with growth of gujrat.
Gujrati are concrn for their state growth.
i.e Mr Modi is going to win.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Pop Head on Dec 13, 2007 03:50 PM   Permalink
If BJP needs to wear a kullah, then they will - anything to win votes

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Sahadevan KK on Dec 13, 2007 04:24 PM   Permalink
Vajpayee also a "payee" of Narendra bhai money, like Rediff commentators write and take money.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Haatim on Dec 13, 2007 03:49 PM   Permalink
please celebrate with us the success of modi on 24.12.2007

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Pop Head on Dec 13, 2007 03:55 PM   Permalink
We would remember his suucesses 2002-2007. May he be the poblem of the SC

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Is It True??
by An Anonymous on Dec 13, 2007 04:00 PM   Permalink
jitega gujarat...
Jai Jai Garvi Gujarat..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by SP on Dec 13, 2007 03:55 PM   Permalink
You are right. Vajpayee was a regular visitor in Iftar parties and he used to the Iftar Parties of Delhi Imam every year. Once Delhi Imam made a comment like this "Out of the guests for my Iftar party, I really appreciate Mr Vajpayee because he really enjoy our chicken during this party"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by sam on Dec 13, 2007 04:03 PM   Permalink
If a person dresses like a Sikh Guru, thousands of Sikhs gather and destroy their establishments , threaten to kill him, announce a bounty on his head - Sikhs are not criticised for being communal and intolerant.
If a Danish journalist depicts the Prophet of the Muslims , Muslims all over the world rise in anger, there is violence, a booty on the head of the Journalist - Muslims are not criticised for being communal and intolerant,

If MF Hussain draws paintings depciting Hindu Gods and Goddesses in sexual positions (which relations are not borne out by ancient texts at all ) and Hindus merely protest , they are called communal, intolerant and taught lessons in secularism by one and all.

The problem apparently is not with Sikhs and Muslims, it is with Hindus , because we are not violent, we accept what ever is dished out to us , we do not have the guts to say that this is wrong , we seek acceptance from outsiders rather than from our conscience. We worship the same GOds and Godesses but dont stand up for them when the time comes.



Be a judge yourself of Hussain's paintings below.

Goddess Durga in sexual union with Tiger
Prophet's Daughter Fatima fully clothed
Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh's head
M.F. Hussain's Mother fully clothed
Naked Saraswati Mother Teresa fully clothed
Naked Shri Parvati Hussain's Daughter well clothed
Naked Draupadi. Well clothed Muslim Lady.
Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Is It True??
by sam on Dec 13, 2007 04:05 PM   Permalink
Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-clothed

Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain's tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred. Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion.

Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler's nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain's own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain's perversion and hypocrisy.

Wake Up Pseudo's

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is It True??
by Deepak on Dec 13, 2007 03:58 PM   Permalink
did someone tell vajpayee that it was chicken ? wow .... what a joke. He did not know what he was eating then Ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Vajpayee ad woos Gujarat voters