The Gujarat incident was not the first of its kind in India nor the last. Some riots in recent times were: 1980 - Moradabad - 1500 to 2000 died in Idgah stampede and violence 1981 - Biharsharif - 80 died as Muslims and hindus clash over land 1984 - Delhi - 2733 die in anti-Sikh riots after Indira Gandhi's killing 1987 - Meerut - 350 died in violence that started over killings by PAC 1989 - Bagalpur - 1000 die in riots triggered by police atrocities 1992 - Mumbai - 1788 die in riots related to Babri Masjid demolition 2002 - Gujarat - 2000 die after Karsevaks' coach is burnt at Godhra 2007 %u2013 Nandigram %u2013 Toll Still not known!!!!!!!!
Then why single out one CM or his party only? All Political parties are same under the skin. Only the Colour of their Flag differs!
RE:RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by Pop Head on Dec 14, 2007 01:30 PM Permalink
Why single a CM or a party? Good question. Avinash most other riots were spontaneous or not engineered by their CM and the party in governance. Consequently, Gujurat Godhra riots single itself out.
These Modi chamchas are incapable of civilized debate. So they throw abuses.
That's right. Show why voting Modi is voting for fascism! These people are paranoid and show evidence of suffering from persecution complex. Maybe they were abused as children and attendeding RSS camps have permanently deranged their minds. They want to instil in the majority (Hindus - more than 80%) to behave with a minority complex (Muslims - 16%). A laughing stock to the world.
Ignore their abuses. That really rattles them. More abuses is an indcation that more they are getting rattled.
I am Pophead. All abuses are welcome. My head is broken with half my brains jutting out.
RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by arun iyer on Dec 23, 2007 06:36 PM Permalink
Very true ; Hope the process continues and wee don't get your mails in future
RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by VASUDEVAN V on Dec 14, 2007 01:49 PM Permalink
Whom are you fooling Mr.Pophead? Anti Sikh riots of 1984 was very much sponsored by Congress and the chief architect was Rajiv Gandhi, the late husband of the Italian born present super PM of our country, Sonia Gandhi (also known as Maino, who hails from the country of Mussolini the Fascist and the Mafia). The Nandigram killings were (I should use `are', as it appears that the killings are still continuing)sponsored by the CPI(M)(I call them the Criminilas Party of India-Murderers). Probably no one talks about these killings, even though they were well planned pogroms sponsored by political parties and leaders (more aptly can be called goondas), because the perpetrators are deemed to be secular and the victims mostly non-Muslims (though Muslims got killed in Nandigram). No one would support Modi if all the politicians, who are more often than not goondas, are punished and the secularists treat all of them with equal contempt. But all the contempt is reserved only for Modi, just because he is supporting the Hindu cause. Hence, there is more support for Modi, as he is a counter-point for the so called secularists. If Modi is not there, our country may be taken over by the Mafia (what I mean is the so called `secular' Mafia, though the Italian Mafia is also equally applicable here).
RE:RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by Pop Head on Dec 14, 2007 02:44 PM Permalink
That's why people like Rajesh Pilot need to be brought to book. Rajesh Pilot was a only a small time Congress leader but Modi is a CM. That's a difference of magnitude.
RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by harshit dave on Dec 14, 2007 04:38 PM Permalink
ur memory is so bad mr pope head, mr rajesh pilot was not part of those riots. he came into politics much later after rajiv gandhi became PM. also he is no more today in this word.
i think u r talking about mr jagdish taitlar. he was a very strong congress man in indira gandhi regime and in those days they were super CMs.
RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by Trailblazer on Dec 14, 2007 01:57 PM Permalink
Dear, some incidents against humanity might have happened in gujrat, but the development and peace since last few years supercedes a few negative point of Mr. Modi. Talking nationalism is always welcome but how can u justify giving mercy to terrorist who had attacked on the parilament and subject of India; caste based resevations and caste based vote bank politics to appease minority of congress. India is in dire need of visionary, progressive,development oriented and ambitious leaders like Narendra Modi to become a prosperous and competitive country at par with china. Defeat of modi will be the dent on the emerging India, optimism, nationalism and democracy at large
RE:RE:Why single out one CM or his party?
by Pop Head on Dec 14, 2007 02:45 PM Permalink
These Modi chamchas are incapable of civilized debate. So they throw abuses.
That's right. Show why voting Modi is voting for fascism! These people are paranoid and show evidence of suffering from persecution complex. Maybe they were abused as children and attendeding RSS camps have permanently deranged their minds. They want to instil in the majority (Hindus - more than 80%) to behave with a minority complex (Muslims - 16%). A laughing stock to the world.
Ignore their abuses. That really rattles them. More abuses is an indcation that more they are getting rattled.
I am Pophead. All abuses are welcome. My head is broken with half my brains jutting out.
